Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to a fresh transfer order already being challenged in a separate petition.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSS No. 317 of 2020 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. |
|||
| Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous, inasmuch as, now a fresh transfer order has been passed against the petitioner, which is under challenge in a separate writ petition. In such view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 09.11.2022 Arpan |
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
