Dismissed
Ram Singh Kaintura v. Mukesh Sileswal
Uttarakhand HCSA/20/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| SA No. 20 of 2015 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. List revised. None appears for the appellant to argue the Second Appeal. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate, is present for the respondent. The Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, would stand vacated. |
|||
| (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) Dated 02.08.2022 Shiv |
Appellant
Respondent
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court