Dismissed
Nawab Alias Babbu v. Jai Pal Arya
Uttarakhand HCAO/516/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01.08.2022 | AO No. 516 of 2012 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. List revised. None appears for the appellant. Mr. P.C. Maulekhi, Advocate, is present on behalf of the respondents. |
||
| The Appeal from Order is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, would stand vacated. |
|||
| (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 01.08.2022 Mahinder/ |
Mahinder
Respondents
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court