Second Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution. No party appeared for the appellant; counsel appeared for respondents. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01.08.2022 | SA No. 24 of 2010 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. List revised. None appears for the appellant. Mr. Anil Joshi, Advocate, is present on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 2. The Second Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, would stand vacated. |
||
| (Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 01.08.2022 Mahinder/ |
Sharad Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
