The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous in a statement-at-bar proceeding. No substantive legal proposition or detail regarding the relief or merits of the petition is provided in the available text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPSS No.280 of 2014
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. B.P.S. Mer, Brief Holder present for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at bar that the writ petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
( Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. ) 10.03.2014
JKJ
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
