Petitioner challenged a shop allotment decision made thirty years ago alleging deception. Court dismissed writ petition summarily ex parte on ground of laches due to inordinate delay.
Writ petition dismissed in limine on ground of laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1826 of 2013
Bhairav Dutt Joshi … Petitioner Vs
State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents
Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate, present for the petitioner Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel, present for the State of Uttarakhand Mr. J.C. Belwal, Advocate, present for respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
07.03.2014
Aswal
Bhairav Dutt Joshi
State of Uttarakhand
Respondent Nos. 2 and 3
Respondent No. 4
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
