The High Court dismissed a belated writ petition challenging departmental orders related to service misconduct. The court held the petition time-barred.
Writ petition dismissed on grounds of laches; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (S/S) No. 298 Of 2014
Jiya Lal … Petitioner
Vs
State of Uttarakhand & others … Respondents
Mr. Vivek Pathak, Advocate, present for the petitioner Mr. B.P.S. Mer, Brief Holder, present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
12.03.2014
ASWAL
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging departmental orders is time-barred due to delay.
Whether the petitioner is liable for dismissal on grounds of laches.
Jiya Lal
State of Uttarakhand
Sudhanshu Dhulia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
