The writ petition in WP(C) No.1144/2017 was dismissed as it had become infructuous due to the parties reaching an amicable settlement.
The writ petition was disposed of as it became infructuous due to settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C) NO.1144/2017
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the petitioners : Mr. B. Deb, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. S. Mahajan, Advocate.
05.09.2017.
It is stated by Mr. B. Deb, the learned counsel for the petitioners, which is not disputed by Mr. S. Mahajan, the learned counsel for the respondents, that the parties have amicably settled the case.
In view of this, this writ petition has become infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
WP(C) NO.1144/2017
Page 1 of 1
T. VAIPHEI
S. TALAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
