Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a pending suit was dismissed as infructuous because the suit itself had already been disposed of by judgment and decree, leaving no live cause for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3486 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNAREDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2960 OF 2022
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia aggrievedby the Order dated 2111012022passed in 1.A.No.1307 ot 2022in OSNo.283 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Nizamabad,Sangareddy. Between:
Feroz Khan, S/o. Abdul Gaffar Khan, age: 37years, Occ:Agriculturecum Bore well mechanic, R/o. 9-13-'157/1 , Hakkam Colony, Nizamabad.
...Petitioner / Defendant
AND
Thota Srinivas, Sio. Venkat Ramulu, age: 48years, Occ: Advocate,R/o- Flat No. 102, K.V- Sai Pranay Residency, Vinayak Nagar, Nizamabad
...Respondent /Plaintiff
l.A. NO: 1OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 of CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleased to stayall further proceedings in O.S. 283 of 2022beforethe PrincipalJunior Civil Judge,at Nizamabad till disposal of the Revision Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T GANGADHAR
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI N MANOHAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
C.R.P.No.296O of 2022
Date:05.02.2026
Between:
Mr.Feroz Khan
... Petitioner
\
AND
Mr.'l hota Srinivas.
. ..Respondent
ORDER:
This Civit Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order
dated 21.10.2022 passed in l.A.No. 1307 of 2022 in O.S.No.283 of
2022 on the fi[e of leamed Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nizamabad
3 When the matrer is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of the Court that the suit in O.S.No.283 of 2022 on the file of
Ieamed Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nizamabad has already been
disposed of vide judgnent and decree dated 07 .07 .2023.
revision petition no longer survires for further adjudication.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Nizamabad, Sa ddv 23 9". 99b irilGangadhar, Ajvocate topuq'-- . One CC to Sri N Manohar, Advocate tOirUCl ' 4. Two CD Copies
ABK /PSL
w
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0510212026
ORDER
CRP.No.2960 of 2022
TH /,1
(
a
!l .J
z
\i i J "'l 21126
)
.A
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS
Gce 1$€/<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Does the revision petition survive when the underlying suit has already been disposed of?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Feroz Khan
Thota Srinivas
Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
