Dismissed¶50

Sri H. Shankar v. The Government of Telangana and 6 others

Telangana HC5 Feb 2026CRP/2873/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

C.R.P.No.2873 of 2022; Telangana High Court; Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy; CRP dismissed as infructuous; underlying suit O.S.No.243 of 2013 already disposed of; challenge to order/decree dated 24.08.2022 in I.A.No.708 of 2017; Section 151 CPC applications for stay of suit and furnishing of documents; Article 227 Constitution of India; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; respondents include Government of Telangana (District Collector, Nizamabad) and T.S. Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation officers; petitioner H. Shankar, contractor, Nizamabad.

What did the court decide?

None; the Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, were directed to stand closed. ¶50

Sri H. Shankar Vs The Government of Telangana and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

¶6

CIVtL REVISION PETITION NO: 2873 OF 2022

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order and Decree made in 1.A.No.708 of 2O17 in O.S.No.243 of 2013 dated^24.08.2022 on the file of the XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sri H.Shankar, S/o. Vittal, aged 42 years, Occ Contractor, R/o. H.No.260,^Ganga Sthan - 2, Armoor Road, Nizamabad.

¶10

... PETITIONER/PLAI NTI FF

¶11

AND

¶12

The Government of Telangana, Represented by the District Collector of Nizamabad, Collector Office, Khaleelwadi, Nizamabad.

¶13

The State Government of Telangana, T.S. Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, lV Floor, RV[/ Building, SC and^ERT Campus, Opp E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, T.S., represented by its The Superintendent of Engineer.

¶14

The State Government of Telangana, T.S.Education and Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, lV Floor, RV[/ Building, SC and^ERT Campus,Opp. E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad^T.S., represented by its Chief Engineer.

¶15

The Executive Engineer, office of Telangana State Education and^Welfare lnfrastructure Development Corporation, 6-2-213, Near R Building, Subhasnagar, Nizamabad, Represented by its the Executive Engineer.

¶16

The State Government of Telangana, T.S'. Education^{and Welfare} lnfrastructure Development Corporation, lV Floor, RVM Building,^{SC and ERT} Campus, Opp. E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh,^Hyderabad, T.S., represented by its The Assistant Engineer Sri. Pratap.

¶17

Sri. Pratap, Assistant Engineer of T.S. Education and Welfare^{lnfrastructure} Development Corporation, lV Floor, RVIvI Building, SC and ERT^Campus, Opp. E Gate of Lalbahadur Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad,^T.S.

¶18

The Executive Engineer, office of T.S. Education and Welfare^{lnfrastructure} Development Corporation, 6-2-213, Near R Building, Subhasnagar, N iza m ab a d, re^p resented bv its H ead o rattSg.gb [tsEfl,fS,fl. =^{* DAN rs}

¶19

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶20

Petition underSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^{pleased to stay} the suit proceedings in O.S. No. 243 of 2013 on the^{file of XIV Additional Chief}

¶21

Judge Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the suit is posted forevidence on 07-122022 and without the documents I have called for. ln fact I am relying on these documents to prrove the case.

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2(t22

¶23

Petition uncjer Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to furnish the documents called for in the suit proceedings in O.S. No. 243 of 2013 on the file of XIV Additional Chief Judge Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the suit is posted for evidence on 07-12-2022 and without the documents I herve called for. ln fact I am relying on these documents to prove the CASC.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G.SUDHA

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents : ---

¶26

The Court macle the following: ORDER

¶27

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶28

THB HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

¶29

C.R.P.No.2873 of 2022