Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy Vs Sri Vikas Raju, IAS — Telangana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Telangana HC
2026
Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy Vs Sri Vikas Raju, IASKukkadapu Ram Moorthy v. Sri Vikas Raju, IAS

Disposed¶42

Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy v. Sri Vikas Raju, IAS

Telangana HC5 Feb 2026CC/65/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana HC, Contempt Case (CC) No. 65 of 2025, decided 05.02.2026 by Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy; contempt for alleged willful disobedience of order dated 05.10.2023 in W.P.No.7027 of 2018; petitioners Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy, Kukkadapu Lingaiah, Kukkadapu Vimala Bai, Kukkadapu Govardan Singh; respondents Vikas Raju (Principal Secretary R&B), Naveen Mittal (Chief Commissioner Land Revenue), R.V. Karnan (District Collector Nalgonda), Narayan Amitmallempati (LAO/RDO Miryalguda); counsel L. Preetham Reddy, Vivek (Asst. GP R&B), Katta Radha Reddy (Asst. GP Land Acquisition); compliance represented by both sides; Contempt Case closed, no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; upon joint representation of compliance with the order dated 05.10.2023 in W.P.No.7027 of 2018, the Contempt Case was closed with no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, were ordered closed.

Why is it important?

In view of the submissions made by both the parties that the order dated 05.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.7027 of 2018 had been complied with, this Court closed the Contempt Case and directed that there shall be no order as to costs. ¶42

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

No substantive relief; upon joint representation of compliance with the order dated 05.10.2023 in W.P.No.7027 of 2018, the Contempt Case was closed with no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, were ordered closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents had disobeyed the order dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2018, and whether the Contempt Case could be closed now that compliance was represented.

Court's answer

In view of the submissions made by both the parties that the order dated 05.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.7027 of 2018 had been complied with, this Court closed the Contempt Case and directed that there shall be no order as to costs.

Ratio / Principle

All miscellaneous applications pending in the cause, if any, were directed to stand closed along with the Contempt Case.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt Case No. 65 of 2025, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy), decided 05.02.2026. Filed by Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy and three others against four official respondents (Sri Vikas Raju, lAS, Principal Secretary, Transport, Roads and Bulidings Department; Sri Naveen Mittal, lAS, Chief Commissioner (Land Revenue); Sri R.V. Karnan, lAS, District Collector, Nalgonda; Sri Narayan Amitmallempati, lAS, Land Acquistion Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Miryalguda) for willful disobedience of the order dated 05.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.7027 of 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioners (Mr. L. Preetham Reddy) and for the respondents (Mr. Vivek, Asst. GP for R & B; Ms. Katta Radha Reddy, Asst. GP for Land Acquisition) jointly represented that the 05.10.2023 order had been complied with. The Court accordingly closed the Contempt Case with no order as to costs and directed that miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. No statute or precedent was cited.

A

T t I i : i

[³⁴⁸⁶ I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 65 OF 2025

Between

Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy, S/o Late K. Lakshmi Narayana, Aged 72^Years, R/o. Miryalguda Town, Nalgonda District

Kukkadapu Lingaiah, S/o Late K. Lakshmi Narayana, Aged 58 Years,^R/o. Miryalguda Town, Nalgonda District

Kukkadapu Vimala Bai, Wo. Late Lxman Singh, Aged 65^Years,R/o. Miryalguda Town, Nalgonda District

Kukkadapu Govardan Singh, S/o. Late Lxman Singh, Aged^{45 Years, R/o.} Miryalguda Town, Nalgonda District

...PETITIONERSMRIT PETITIONERS

AND

Sri Vikas Raju, lAS, Principal Secretary, Transport, Roads and^Bulidings Department, Secertariat Building, Saifabad, Hyderabad 500⁰²²

Sri Naveen Mittal, lAS, Chief Commissioner,^{(LandRevenue),Stateof} Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad

Sri R.V. Karnan, lAS, District Collector, Nalgonda,^{NalgondaDistrict.}

Sri Narayan Amitmallempati lAS, Land Acquistion Officer cum^Revenue Divisional Officer Miryalguda, Nalgonda District.^{(Presently Sub Collector)}

...RESPONDENTS

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri L. Preetham Reddy

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: Sri Vivek, Assistant^{GP for R & B}

Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 4: Ms. Katta Radha^Reddy, Assistant GP for Land Acquisition

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

CASE N of2025

Date:05.02.2026

Between:

Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy and three others

... Petitioners

AND

Sri Vikas Raju, IAS and three others

...Respondents

:ORDER:

This Contempt Case is filed against the willful disobedience of the respondents with respect to the order, dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2018.

2- Heard Mr.L.Preetham Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.vivek, learned Assistant Government pleader for R & B Departrnent and Ms.Katta Radha Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition

2

It is represented by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioners as well as respondents that the order, dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in w.P.No.7027 of 2018 had been complied with.

In view of the submissions made by both the parties, this

Contempt Case is closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- N.CHANDRA SEKHAR DEPUTY REG

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

Two CCs to GP for Roads and Buildings, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

Two CCs to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court for the State of Telangana. lourl

One CC to Sri L. Preetham Reddy, Advocate IOPUC]

Two CD Copies

VHiPSL

w

HIGH COURT

I

DATED: 0510212026

o E Tt

CC.No.65 of 2025

F.
trii S T4
t
o
()t 2 5 l'lAR 2|]2fi
*
i-

CLOSING THE CC

%^.S &"'

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the respondents had disobeyed the order dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2018, and whether the Contempt Case could be closed now that compliance was represented.¶36
The court held
In view of the submissions made by both the parties that the order dated 05.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.7027 of 2018 had been complied with, this Court closed the Contempt Case and directed that there shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶42

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Order dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2018, wilful disobedience of which by the respondents occasioned this Contempt Case; compliance with it was subsequently represented and the Contempt Case was closed.¶36
High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad · 05.10.2023
Prior proceeding
Contempt Case No. 65 of 2025 filed against the willful disobedience of the respondents with respect to the order dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2018.¶36
Prior proceeding
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondents represented before the Court that the order dated 05.10.2023 in W.P.No.7027 of 2018 had been complied with.¶40

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy¶9
Sri L. Preetham Reddy
petitioner
Kukkadapu Lingaiah¶10
Sri L. Preetham Reddy
petitioner
Kukkadapu Vimala Bai¶11
Sri L. Preetham Reddy
petitioner
Kukkadapu Govardan Singh¶12
Sri L. Preetham Reddy
respondent
Sri Vikas Raju, lAS¶15
Sri Vivek
respondent
Sri Naveen Mittal, lAS¶16
Ms. Katta Radha Reddy
respondent
Sri R.V. Karnan, lAS¶17
Ms. Katta Radha Reddy
respondent
Sri Narayan Amitmallempati lAS¶18
Ms. Katta Radha Reddy

Coram

AI extract

Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddyauthor¶6

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 5 Feb 2026 · February
Registered: 6 Jan 2025
Case no.: CC/65/2025
CNR: HBHC010006842025
Bench: Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy
Disposal: CLOSED NO COSTS
Case type: CONTEMPT CASE

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

B. Bal Reddy Vs B. Basamma
4 Feb 2026
Jillella Sai Reddy (Died as Per LRs) Vs G.Laxmi and Another
4 Feb 2026
K.Manik Reddy Vs Smt Laxmamma
4 Feb 2026
Sri H. Shankar Vs The Government of Telangana and 6 others
5 Feb 2026
Dumbala Malathi Vs M. Sridhar Reddy and another
5 Feb 2026
Feroz Khan Vs Thota Srinivas
5 Feb 2026

Cite this judgement

Kukkadapu Ram Moorthy v. Sri Vikas Raju, IAS, CC/65/2025 (TEL), decided on 5 February 2026.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history3

Order dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2018, wilful disobedience of which by the respondents occasioned this Contempt Case; compliance with it was subsequently represented and the Contempt Case was closed.High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad · 05.10.2023
Contempt Case No. 65 of 2025 filed against the willful disobedience of the respondents with respect to the order dated 05.10.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7027 of 2018.
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondents represented before the Court that the order dated 05.10.2023 in W.P.No.7027 of 2018 had been complied with.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy

Parties & counsel