Dismissed¶41

Dumbala Malathi v. M. Sridhar Reddy and another

Telangana HC5 Feb 2026CRP/1495/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

C.R.P.No.1495 of 2022, High Court for the State of Telangana (Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, J., 05.02.2026): revision petition under Article 227 against order/decree in C.M.A.No.19 of 2018 dt.08.04.2022 (V Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Bhongir) dismissed as infructuous without costs because the underlying suit O.S.No.46 of 2016 (Junior Civil Judge, Bhongir) was disposed of on 22.12.2022; pending miscellaneous petitions closed; no precedent engaged and no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

None; the C.R.P. was dismissed as infructuous and no order as to costs was made ¶41

Dumbala Malathi Vs M. Sridhar Reddy and another — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1495 0F 2022

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against^{the Order} and Decree made in C.M.A.No.19 of 2018 dated 08.04.2022 on^{the file of the V} Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bhongir.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Dumbala Malathi, Wo G.D. Narsimha Reddy, Aged about^{57 years,Occ. Housewife,} R/o H.No 14-166, lVirjalguda,Opp.Andhra Bank, Malkajgiri,^{HyderabadpETITtONER}

¶10

AND

¶11

IVl. Sridhar Reddy S/o tt/lalla Reddy, Aged about^{43 years, Occ. Business,R/o} H. N o. 1 6 -2-l,tlc -437, Ma lakpet Colony, Hyderabad

¶12

Kattamanchi Giridhar, S/o K. l\Ianikyam Pillai,^{Aged about 55 years,Occ-} Business, R/o H.No.16-2-B36lG, 1st Floor,^{Road No.10, MadhavaNagar,} saidabad' Hyderabad

¶13

...RES'.NDENTS

¶14

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the^{circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleasedto} suspend the order and decree dt.08-04-2022^{passed in CIMA No.19 of 2018 on the} file of the V Addl, District and Sessions Judge,^Bhongir.

¶16

lA NO: 2 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Order 8 Rule 1(A)⁽³⁾ C P C R/w Section^{151 CPC praying that} in the circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition, the High} Court may be pleased to receive the document^{i.e. (i) an agreement dt.28-08-2}15} executed by Shiva Rameshwar Vukanti of the^{petitioner (ii) FIR No.93 of 2017} dt.O7-04-2017 on the file of the Yadagirigutta^{Police Station,Rachakondaas} additional documents.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. P.BHANU PRAKASH

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BIDARKAR GOPAL

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶22

THE H.ON'BLE SRT JUSTICB VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA RBDDY

¶23

C.R.P.No.l495 of 2022

¶24

Date:05.02.2026

¶25

Between:

¶26

Mrs.Dunrbala Malathi.

¶27

... Petitioner

¶28

AND

¶29

Mr.M.Sridhar Reddy and another.

¶30

...Respondents

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order and decree irr CMA No.19 of 2018 dated 08.04.2022 on the frle of V

¶33

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhongir.

¶34

He'ard [earned counsel for the petitioner.

¶35

W:ren the rnatter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of'the Court that the suit in O.S.No.46 of 2016 on the file of learned lienior Civil Judge at Bhongir has already been disposed of

¶36

vide judg,ment and decree dated 22.12.2022.

¶37

.,/: I::at.i:ij--

¶38

¶39