Dismissed¶55

Mallela Anitha v. Ramsani Pandu and Another

Telangana HC5 Feb 2026CRP/2903/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana; CRP.No.2903 of 2022; Article 227 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy J.; order dated 05.02.2026; civil revision petition dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; challenge to order dated 17.11.2022 in I.A.No.1179 of 2022 in O.S.No.1634 of 2022 (I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar); underlying suit disposed of vide judgment and decree dated 13.09.2024; Mallela Anitha v. Ramsani Pandu and Sabavath Koti; counsel: K Kiran Kumar, Sudhakar Govu, R Sunil Naik.

What did the court decide?

In view of the disposal of the suit in O.S.No.1634 of 2022 vide judgment and decree dated 13.09.2024, the cause in the present civil revision petition no longer survives for further adjudication. ¶40

Mallela Anitha Vs Ramsani Pandu and Another — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2026)

¶1

[^{3486 ]}

¶2

oF^rELAN:ANA rN rHE^{HIGH couRrfo$Jtr^t"HE} FIF-rtl'?i\Y^{oF FEBRUARY} rHuRsDA' Two^tioti'snND 'n'^{AND TwENTY slx}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

RAMAKRISHNA^REDDY THE^{HONOURAB LE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI} o 3

¶5

IL V

¶6

by^{the orderdated} 2022^{on the file of} Petition^{under Article227 ofConstitution of lndiaaggrieved} 1634^of .179 of 2022 in^{O'S No} 17111t2O22^{Passed in lA No} Ranga^{ReddYDistrict at} District^{and S0ssions Judge'} the^{Courtof the I Additional} L.B.Nagar'

¶7

Occ.^Housewife' 43 Years ""Tfi:" Anitha,^{w/o' Yadaiah Aqed about} Salvandriguo']^{*#i"g"''n'nga R6ooyDistrict'} ...APPellanUDefendant^No'2

¶8

AND

¶9

l Ramsani^{pandu, S/o. Kistaiah, Aged -1no{ ++ years, ot9 Agriculture'} R/o.H.No.g-84,^{Satvendrig,of,viri,,g",rlanoig;-,;a,nltanoat,Ranga Reddy} District'

¶10

"'RespondenuPlaintiff

¶11

2 Sabavath^{Koti, W/o' Ramulu. Nayak' aO?d'.u?out64 years' Occ Agriculture'} R/o. H^{No. 5 -g-gt 4,Hiil Fort, giririn;;air]sairanro,Khairatabad'Hyderabad}

¶12

No'¹

¶13

"'ResPondenUDefendant

¶14

l.A. NO:^{1 OF 2022}

¶15

Petition under^{Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition,the High court may be pleasedto} Suspend the^{operation of the orderd1.17t11t2022 in l'ANo'1179 of 2022in} o.s.No.1634^{0f 2a220n the file of I Additional Districtahd sessions Judge'Ranga} Reddy District^{at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the C'tM'A}

¶16

Counsel for the^{Petitioner: Sri K Kiran Kumar}

¶17

CounselfortheRespondentNo'1:SrisudhakarGovu CounselfortheRespondentNo'2:SriRSunilNaik The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶18

rN rIIE IrIGH t"riii?r)#t1ilf"

¶19

oF TELANGANA

¶20

THE HON'BLT, SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDD Y

2 2

Between:

Date:05.02.2026

Mrs.Mallela Anirha.

... Petitioner

AND

Mr.Ralnsar i pandu and another.

¶28

...Respondents

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This 'livir Revisio, petition is fired aggrieved by rhe order dated 17'tr-202-t- passed in I.A.No .1r7g of 2022in o.S.No .1634 0f 2022 on the file of learned I Additionar District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District ar I_.B.Nagar.

¶31

t (

¶32

Heard learned counsel f,or the petitioner.

¶33

when rhe rnatter is taken up for hearing, it is brought to the notice of the (lourt that the suit in o.s.No. 1634 of 20z2on the file of

¶34

leamed I Atlditionat^{District and Sessions Judge, RangaReddv}

¶35

¶36

¶37

District at L.B.Nagar has already been disposed of vide^{judgment and}

¶38

decree dated 13.09.2024.

¶39

In view of the above developnrent, cause in the present civil

¶40

revision petition no longer survives fbr further adjudication.

¶41

Accordingl,v, this civil Revision petition is dismissed as

¶42

infi'uctuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶43

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shail stand crosed.

¶44

SD/- S.MALLIKAJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶45

/iTRUE COPYII

¶46

¶47

To, SECTION OFFICER 1 The I Addition L.B.N agar. al District and Sessions Judge, 2 ga Reddy District at 3. OneOne CC to CC to SriSri K Kiran Kumar Advocate t^OPUCJ 4. One CC to Sri R Sudhakar Sunil G ovu, Ad vocate loPUc:j 5 Two CD Copies Naik, Advocate IOPUC]

Sa/l,.SL

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0510212026

ORDER

lHE S
t
()
r 6 i'lAn 2026
* *

¶54