T.Saraswathi, Vs The Commissioner, Endowments… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

T.Saraswathi, Vs The Commissioner, Endowments… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

T.*

| ;,/

[³³⁰² I

f

?

1r 0

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH^{DAY OF AUGUST} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

.t

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{K. SARATH}

9121

**

f

''t6

s'i

f

.i.

i s

.l I 6

Between:

T.Saraswathi, Wo. T.Ganesh,^{Age 71 Years, Occ Business,C/o. Shop} No.68, S.P.A.T.Complex, L.B.Nagar,^{R.R.District.}

G.Janakamma^(Die<i), Rep. by htr^{Husband, By_1am^e.G.Ramaswam.y,_9{9.} Late Venkaiah,'Age'bg Yearl, Occ^{Business,-Clo.Shop No.14and 1414,} S.P.A.T.Complex, L.B.Nagar,^{R.R. District.}

P.Pavani, D/b. Dhasahaiadha,^{Age 26 Years, Occ Business, Clo. Shop} No.89, S.P.A.T.Complex,^{L.B.Nagar,R.R.District.}

P.Dha'sharadha, S/o. Kasaiah,^{Ale 57 years, Occ Business, C/o. ShopNo.90,} S.P.A.T.Complex, L.B.Nagar,^{R.R.District.}

S. D.V.L.prasanna, iRep.by^{T.Santosh Reddy,S/o. T.Bal R.eddy,4giZa Years,} Occ Business, i/o. Shop^{No.91, S.P.A.T.Complex, L.B.Nagar, R.R.District.}

1. M.L.Narsimha Rao, Refi.by T.Bal^{Reddy, S/o.Late RamachandraRedd-y.,Age} 61^years, Occ Busindss, Clo. Shop-No.92,^{S.P.A.T.Complex,L.B.Nagar,} R.R.District.

Mallarapu Venkateswartu,^{Rep.by his BrothqlM.-Ggi,.S/o.Late.Gangaiah.,Age} 39^yedrs, Occ Business, C7o.'Shop^{No.97, S.P.A.T.Complex,L.B.Nagar,} R.R.District.

...PETITIONERS

AND

The Commissioner, Endowments^{Department,Government of Andhra} Pradesh, Tilak Road, Boggula^{Kunta, Hyderabad-}

The Assistani CommissTdner^{of Endowments,Ranga Reddy District,Tilak} Road, Boggula Kunta, HYderabad.

The Road, Boggula Kunta, HYderabad.^'Mariiger, Sri Prasanna HYderabad.^{Anjaneya Swamy Temple, L.B. Nagar,} Hyderabad.

.,.RESPONDENTS

,t

.t,

6

Petition under Article 226 of the^{Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith, the High Courtmay be} pteased to lssue a Writ, Order or Direction more^{particularly one in the natureof} Writ of Mandamus, declaring the^{action of the respondents 1 to 3 in proceeding} with the auction of^petitioner shops^{during the pendency of Writ Petitions without} having any right or title over their^{shops and the action of the respondents 1 to 3}

f*,

I

.fI 0

i

I

I

in allotting them shops to third parties is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to stay all further^proceedings in pursuance of the auction illegally conducted and to re-induct them their respective shops, till the disposal of this writ petition

201

.t, I {t

,t #

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the auction illegally conducted and to re-induct us in our respective shops, till the disposal of this writ petition

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D Y L N CHARYULU

,t a

Counsel for the Respondent No.1&2: Gp FOR ENDOWMENTS

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI CH. SATISH KUMAR, SC FOR ENDOWMENTS

.L #

The Court made the following: ORDER

t' G

rB$

.t. *

,I c

1

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH I]IT PETITION No.9L2l of 2Ol3

ORDER:

Today when the matter is taken up for^hearing the learned Counsel for petitioners^{would submit that} the cause in the present Writ Petition^{does not survive} and thereby the Writ Petition has^{become infructuous.}

Recording the aforementioned submission,^the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.^{No order as} to costs

As sequel to it, Miscellaneous^{Petitions pending, if}

&fly, shall stand closed

rt"i,

,,TRUE COPY//

SD'.L. VIJAY IST ISTRAR

SECTTON^OFFICER

't {$

To,

t

,t {r

l.OneCCtoSRl.D.Y.L.N.CHARYUIU,A{vqcate[oPUCl 2. Two ccs to^{Gp FoRENDOWrr/lrNriS,Hlgncor* for the stateof reiangana} at Hyderabad [OUT]

one CC to SRli"dHl^{snrlsH KUMAR, SC FoR END9WMENTS [6PUC]}

Two CD CoPies

BM BS

I

'a' 6

\ x

f

i

\

t

I

I

;

HIGH COURT

DATED:2610812025

**.

1f.

I

.t' I +

'I I {t

.i. $

I

ORDER

WP.No.9121 of 2013

(-r . ,-, .-l .".,:.-"\a-.::^
'';"'\l'.
a. "/.'. .i
.(.
<br>?
t;/_1f:if I
1 fi L[; iiirllJ .t!tI
:)'-"

.i a

.i #

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS

i

k
t 6't.
b
\I.
*

f