Dismissed¶50

G. Hanuman Chandu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC26 Aug 2025WP/39095/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, WP No. 39095 of 2013, decided 26.08.2025 by K. Sarath, J. Certiorari petition under Article 226 against AP Endowments Tribunal order in O.A. No. 2849/10 dated 04.09.2013 and State revisionary orders No. LR. 5656/Endts. II(1)/2013 dated 22.08.2013 concerning Sri Panduranga Vtthaleshwara Swamy Temple endowment matters. Dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause did not survive; no adjudication on merits; pending miscellaneous petitions (including WPMP No. 48567 of 2013 stay application) dismissed; no costs. No precedents cited or discussed.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the petition has become infructuous, the Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. ¶50

G. Hanuman Chandu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

[³³⁰² ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶9

¶10

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶15

WRIT PETITION NO: 39095 oF 2013

Between:

G. Hanumar Chandu, S/ o Late Narayan Rao, Aged about 60 years, Occupation_Business, R/o H No 10-l-700, West Maiedpatty, SecunUJranaJ, # 9-3-'14, cUTTIKONDA Residency, Regimental , Bazaar, Se'cunAeraOaO

¶20

...PETITIONER

¶21

AND

¶22

1 The State of Andhra Pradesh,- represented by its principal secretary Revenue (Fndowments ll) Department A^p Secretariat, HyOeraUdO

¶23

1. The Commissioner of Endowments, DHARMIK Bhavan, BOGGULA_KUNTA, Tilak Road, Hyderabad

¶24

J. The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Secunderabad 4. SRI PANDURANGA VTTHALESHWARA SWAMY^,Tempte. Reoimenrat Bazaal represented by its Manager, Regimental Bazaar, Seiunderabid

¶25

1. lne A P Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad, Represented by its Chairman

¶26

...RESPONDENTS

¶27

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of certiorari calling for all the records pertaining to and related to o.A No 2g4gl1o on the file of 5th Respondent AP Endowments Tribunal and set aside the order of 5th respondent rribunal in o.A No 2g4gt1o dated 04.09 2013 so far as it went against the petitioner and the, order of lst respondent vide orders in revisionary proceedings bearing No LR. 5656/ Endts. il (1)t2013 dated 22.08.2013

.t.

l.A. NO: 1 oF 2013(WPMP. NO:48567 oF 2013)

¶34

Petition under section 15 r cpc praying that in the )ircumstances stared .i o in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High co r 1 may be preased 10 grant stay of ail further proceedings in o.A No 2g4gr' t on the fire of 5th respondent AP Endowments Tribunar in pursuant to the or<i,,rs dated 04 0g.2013 pending the disposal of present writ petition

¶35

¶36

Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. IMMANENI RAMA RAO

¶37

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to3: Gp FOR ENDOWME NTS

¶38

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI CH. SATISH KUMAI?

¶40

SC FOR ENDOWMEhI rS

¶41

The Court made the following: ORDER