M/s. Sudhakara Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

M/s. Sudhakara Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; liberty to the petitioner to file a Contempt Case; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of the 3rd respondent (Sub-Registrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri) in passing the rejection order vide Refusal No. 02 of 2024 dated 25.05.2024 was illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable, and whether the Sub-Registrar should be directed to receive and register the Sale Deed dated 04.10.2023 (raised in the writ prayer; not adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn) +1 more

Ratio / Principle

Permission granted as sought for to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a Contempt Case; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (K. Sarath, J.), Writ Petition No. 25134 of 2025, order dated 26.08.2025 — Registration/refusal dispute: the petitioner, M/s. Sudhakara Infra Tech Pvt. Ltd., had sought a writ of mandamus declaring illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable the rejection order vide Refusal No. 02 of 2024 dated 25.05.2024 passed by the 3rd respondent, Sub-Registrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri, and directions to receive and register a Sale Deed dated 04.10.2023 for land admeasuring 25,531 square yards in Survey Nos. 252, 253, 263 and 264 of Kowkur Village, Malkalgiri Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, together with a continuous mandamus against the 2nd respondent, District Registrar, for non-disposal of Appeal No. 8548 of 2024. Before any substantive adjudication, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a Contempt Case, making an endorsement to that effect. Permission was granted as sought; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a Contempt Case; there was no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition stood closed. No ruling was made on the refusal memo or the pending appeal.

[³³⁰² ]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF^AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

WRIT PETITION NO: 25134 OF 2025

Between:

Ivl/s. Sudhakara lnfra Tech P\4. Ltd,^{Rep. by its lrlanaging Director, Sri Allam} Sudhakara Reddy, S/o. Allam^{Vinukonda Reddy,} fged^{about 42 Years,Occ.} Business IVIHB/F -1404, l,tly Home Bhooja,^{Gachibowli,Serlingampally,} tVadhapur, Hyderabad, R.R District,^{Telangana- 500081.}

...PETITIONER

AND

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its^{Principal Secretary,Revenue} Department, TS Secretariat Building.^{Hyderabad, Telangana.}

2 The District Registrar,^{lvledchal-t,4alkajgiriDistrict, TelanganaState}

3 The Sub-Registrar, Medchal-Malkaigiri^{Diskict, TelanganaState}

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe^{Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filedtherewith, the High Court may be} pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or^{direction, more particularlyone in} the nature of Writ of Mandamus^{declaringthe action of the 3' respondentin} passing the rejectron order vide Refusal No.⁰² of^{2024 daled.25.05.2024as} illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable^{in the eyes of law and consequently, to direct} the 3rd Respondent^- Sub-Registrar,^{Medchal-Malkajgiri,to receiveand register} the Sale Deed dated 04.1O.2023,^{by setting aside the memo of RefusalNo' 02 of} 2024, in respect of land admeasuring^{25,531 square yards situatedin Survey} Nos. 252 (Ac 1-34 Gts.),^{253 (Ac.1-23 Gts.), 263 (Ac- 1-24 Gts.),and 264 (Ac'} 0-10 Gts.) of Kowkur^{Village, Malkalgiri Mandal,Medchal-MalkajgiriDistrict,} Telangana state, and^{issue a writ of continuous l\Iandamusto declare the action} of the 2nd Respondent in not^{disposing off the AppealNo. 8548 of 2024 as illegal} and arbitrary.

...ffi :7

lA NO:^'f OF 2025

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the r;ircumstances stated} in the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition, the High corrl may be pleasedto} direct the 3rd respondent^{to receive and register the salec eed cla[ed 04.10.2023} by staying the operation^{and effect of ref usal memo N:02 of 2024 daied.} 25.O5.2024,^pending disposal^{of the wrrt petition.}

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI N.BHUJANGA RAO}

Counsel for the Respondents:^{AGP FOR STAMPS& REGISTRATION}

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

WRIT PETITION No.25134 of2Q25

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition ald requested to grant liberty to file a Contempt Case and made an endorsement to that effect.

Accordingly, permission is granted as sought for. The -writ pe tition is dismisscd as withdrawn gr.anting liberty to the petitioner to lile a Contempt Case. However, there shall be no order as lo costs.

J Miscellaneous petitions, il any, pending in this Writ

Petition shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/.K.BHAVANI^SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR a SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRI^{N.BHUJANGARAO, Advocate} IOPUCI

Two CCs to GP FoR^{STA[\4PS& REGISTRATIoN,High Court for the State} of Telangana at HYderabad [OUT]

Two CD CoPies BSR GJP&

\

!

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2610812025

ORDER

WP.No-25134 of 2025

E SI4 14:
(
j $
(
J-)
ll 6 r{0l/ 206
a
r) t
€spATCH F-O

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

AS WITHDRAWN,

WITHOUT COSTS

v
$