Maliha Constructions Private Limited Vs The State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

Maliha Constructions Private Limited Vs The State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of respondent No.3 (Sub-Registrar, Doodh Bowli) in entering the petitioner premises door numbers H.No. 19-2-2391131A and H.No. 19-2-2391131A/1, admeasuring 7500 sq. yds, situated at Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad, T.G., in the prohibition list without any valid notification under Section 22-A of the Registration Act is illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principle of natural justice, warranting setting aside of the prohibition orders and removal of the premises from the prohibition list. (Raised in the prayer; not adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn.)

Ratio / Principle

Learned counsel for the petitioners sought and obtained permission to withdraw the writ petition, having made an endorsement to that effect on the court bundle.

Key takeaways

Permission granted as sought for; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.ratio¶29
Miscellaneous petitions/applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed (sentence carried over the page break at paras 30-31).ratio¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 21220 of 2025, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Special Original Jurisdiction), Justice K. Sarath, order dated 26-08-2025. A private limited company ('I\ilaliha Constructions Private Limited' as OCR-printed), represented by its managing directors Sri Mohammed Parvaizuddin and Sri Mohammed lttlandoor Khan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a Mandamus declaring illegal, arbitrary and violative of natural justice the entry by respondent No.3, the Sub-Registrar, Doodh Bowli, Hyderabad, of its premises door numbers H.No. 19-2-2391131A and H.No. 19-2-2391131A/1, admeasuring 7500 sq. yds at Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad, in the prohibition list without any valid notification under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, with a consequent request to set aside the prohibition orders and remove the premises from the list; an interim application (IA No. 1 of 2025, Section 151 CPC) prayed for direction to respondent No.3 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18/06/2025. Before any substantive adjudication, learned counsel for the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition with an endorsement on the court bundle; the court granted permission, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and directed that pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed. No finding was recorded on the Section 22-A grievance; the order yields no citable holding on prohibition-list notifications under the Registration Act. Respondent No.4 was a private individual, Mujeeb Shariff; counsel for him is not named in the cause title.

[³³⁰²¹

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TE} A AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF^AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{K. SARATH}

WRIT PE TITION NO: 21220 O^{F 2025}

Between:

I\ilaliha Constructions Private Limited, Represented^{by its Managing Directors'}

1. Sri Mohammed Parvaizuddin. S/o. Sri Mohammed^{Moizuddin, agedabout 41} years, Occ- Business, RlO,19-4-430113/1, BNK Colony, Tadbun, Hyderabad^- 500064.

Sri Mohammed lttlandoor Khan, S/o. Sri Mohammed^{Bahadur Khan, aged} about 35 years, Occ- Business, Rlo.10-2-269141, Shanti^{Nagar, Hyderabad-} 28'.

...PET',.NERS

AND

'1 . The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

The District Registrar Hyderabad, At Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

The Sub- Registrar, Doodh Bowli, Hyderabad.

Mujeeb Shariff, S/o Late Omer Sheriff Aged about 52^{years Occ- Service,} R/o.16-11-10, Saleem Nagar, It/alakpet, Hyderabad^- 500036.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Courtmay be} pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order/s or Direction/s more^particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action^{of the respondents} more particularly the respondent No.3 in entering the^{petitioner premises door} numbers i.e., H.No. 19-2-2391131A and H.No. 19-2-2391131A/1 , admeasuring⁷⁵⁰⁰ sq. yds, situated at Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad, T.G.,^{without there being any} valid notification under Section 22-A ol the Registration Act^{as illegal, arbitrary} violation of^principle of natural^justice and consequently^{set aside the prohibition} orders an direct the respondent No.3 to remove^{the petitioner premisesdoor} numbers i.e., H.No. 19-2-2391131A and H.No.^{19-2-2391131A/1} ,^{admeasuring7500} sq. yds, situated at Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad, T.G.,^{from the prohibitionlist}

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151^{CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto} direct the responder No.3 to^{considerthe representationdated 1810612025given} by the^petitioner to the^{respondentNo.3 to remove the petitioner premisesdoor} numbers i.e., H.No.^{1g-2-239t13lA and H.No. 19-2-2391131A11,admeasuring7500} sq. yds, situated at Chandulal^{Baradari,Hyderabad,T.G:, from prohibitionlist}

Counsel for the Petitioners:^{SRl. MIRZASHAH NAWAZ BAIG}

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos. 1to3:GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION}

Counsel for the ResPondent^No.4:-'

The Court made the following:^ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

WRIT PE"IITION No.2122O of 2O25

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect on the court bundle

Accordingly, permission is granted as sought for. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ

Petition shall stand closed

,

//TRUE^COPY//

SD/. M.JAWAHAR^REDDY SISTANT^REGIS

ECTION^OFFICER

To,

l. One^{CC to SRl. MlRZA StlAlINWAZ BAlG'Adv-ocate lOPUCl} 2. Two ccs^{to Gp i:6R bTAIVlps nr.io flEcislnnrloN,Highcourtfor the} Siaie ot^{Telanganaat Hyderabad[OUT]}

Two^{CD CoPies}

BM TKS ?*Q-

, t./ t

HIGH COURT

DATED i261A42025

ORDER

?'.
(:')
L,\ O 6 JAN 2[28
* *

WP.No.21220 of 2025

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

@*0, r olt')uS