Writ petition challenging an Endowment Tribunal order and seeking enhancement of rent was not argued; counsel sought leave to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, which the court granted, dismissing the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I
I i
[3300l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE-STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITIONNO : 3839 OF 2025
Between:
G. RAKESH, S/o. G. SHANKIR, Age_d About. 30 years.Occ. Business. R/o. Shop No. 6-1-6/10, Sri Malikarjuna swami Gmpre i;;;6;, shotiteul bel;il;;io"aol
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, tne Hijrr 'co'u.t .n"v'0. pleased to issue a writ order or Direction particurarry in the naiure of naanaamus setting a side the order Dated 2or12t2024 in o.A. No. 15s oF 2018 on ttre rite or the Honble Endowment rribunar, Hyderabad and direct ftre nesponJeni to dispose of the Petitioners Representaiion dated oglo2t2o23 ro,- "nn"n"erent or 100 percent rent on present rent which was receiving by the 3rd .."rp"no"nt.-' '
IANO:1O F 2025
Petition under section is1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in S.:Ii9rrIfired in support^of.thepeiitio;,Ine Higt Courr may O. pr"*LJt" srAY the operation of the order dated 2oil2lzozi in o.n. No. 1 55 of 2018 on the file of the Honble Endowment Tribunal, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.S.K.TRILOK RAJ Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR ENDOWMENTS I he Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLF: SRIJUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPA,IN{'
WRIT PEf,ITIONN0.3839 0F 2025.
oRAL ORDEF:
Learned counselfor the petitionerseeks p()rrr1'sslon of this Courtto withdraw the present Writ Petiticrr' with liberty tofiL: afresh Writ Petition. He had rnadethe endorsement -othe said effect on the bundle'
case, thet'e sf allbe no order as to costs.
As eL sec ut:l thereto,miscellaneous petitions if any,
pending in the WritPetition shall stand closed'
sD/- l-. L/\TiSHMIBABU AS s\rA,NI' REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// .,; SE:C'fl,3N OFFICER
To, cl I 1 One CC toSFI T.S.K.TRILOKRAJ, Advocate' [O
BSK
GJP u
HIGH COURT
DATED:18102i2025
ORDER
T. 1 I I > I - -:..r '',
Lf
Y
04 Jiil 2t'21
I
S;a 1 q .ri ),
:-.:= =17
WP.No.3839 of2025
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
,,C
G. Rakesh
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Endowments, Hyderabad
The Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Secunderabad
Sri Mallikarjun Swamy Temple Bholakpur, Secunderabad, Rep. by its Executive Officer
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
