Dismissed¶34

B. Narayana v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC18 Feb 2025WP/3835/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition 3835 of 2025 Telangana High Court dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petition; Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka; dated 18-02-2025; Article 226 mandamus challenge to Endowment Tribunal Hyderabad order dated 20-12-2024 in O.A. No. 151 of 2018; representation dated 09-02-2023 for 100 percent rent enhancement; respondents: State of Telangana Endowments Department, Assistant Commissioner Endowments Secunderabad, Sri Mallikarjun Swamy Temple Bholakpur; Section 151 CPC stay petition; counsel T.S.K. Trilok Raj; GP for Endowments; withdrawal endorsement on bundle; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to withdraw the writ petition and file a fresh writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending stand closed.

B. Narayana Vs the State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

i; I i

¶3

t,f H COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

[³³⁰⁰¹

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO:3835 OF 2025

¶8

Betweern

¶9

I B . Narayana; S/o. Balnarasaiah, Aged About 59 years, Occ. Business, Rt/o. Shop No. 6-1 -6/9, Sri Maliikarjuna Swamy Temple Premises, Bholakpur, Secunderabad

¶10

...'ETI,.NER/RES'.NDENT AND

¶11

The State Of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Endowments, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Secunderabad.

¶13

Sri Mallikarjun Swamy Temple, Bholakpur, Secunderabad. Rep. by its Executive Officer i , ...RESPoNDENTS/APPLIcANTS

¶14

qetition I under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased' to issue a 1Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the natuie of WRIT OF MANDAMUS setting a side the Order Dated 2011212024 in O.A. No. 151 OF 201b on the file of the Honourable Endowment Tribunal, Hyderabad and direct the Respondent to dispose of the Petitioners Representation dated 0910212O23 tor enhancement of 100 percent rent on present rent which was receiving by the 3rd respondent.

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to STAY the Opeiration of the Order dated 2011212024 in O.A. No. 151 of 2018 on the file of the Horiourable Endowment Tribunal, Hyderabad.

¶17

l ri

¶18

counsdl for iherpelitioner: sRl T.s.K.TRILoK RAJ counsdl for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS counsdl for the Respondent No.3: --

¶19

'{ii

¶20

The Cotrt made the following: ORDER ti1

¶21

€"7

¶22

HON'BLE SRI^{JUSTICENAGF^SHBHEEMAPAKA}

¶23

WRIT PEf,ITION^{No.3835 0F 2025}

¶24

ORAL ORDER:

¶25

Learned counsel for^{the petitionerseekspermission} of this Court to^{withdraw the present Writ Petition with} liberty to file a^{fresh Writ Petition. He had made the} endorsement to the^{said effect on the bundle'}

¶26

Granting liberty as^{sought for, this Writ Petitionis} dismissed. as^{withdrawn.In the circumstances of the} case, there shall^{be no order as to costs.}

¶27

As a sequel thereto,^{miscellaneous petitions,lfany,}

¶28

pending in the Writ Petition shatl^{stand closecl.}

¶29

SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA^RAO ASSI STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶30

To 1 ne QC to SR I T.S.K.TRILOK RAJ, Advocate [OPUC 2 Tlwo CCs toF P FOR ENDOWMENTS,^{High Court for} the State of Telangana, zit H ydera bad. touTl J Two CD Co^pies PSK. GJP

¶31

l I I I l t; 1' I t,

¶32

HIGH COURr
.ii

¶33

I
I
DATED:1810212025
i
i
-{
1
t
I
,l
ORD R
I
WP.t o.'3835 ot 2025

¶34

,
1' !I
I
t, i
III
.;
l
DIS ISSING. THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
i
I t
lw 1,2 ')( i
6
I
i
i
I
tii1IIii1IIi1IIIII t
I
&t
: tr..tr.. -:l I
'a
I

¶35

tii1IIii1IIi1IIIII
&t
-:l
: tr..tr..
'a

¶36

1$|- S 14
e
nt)
0 5 r{AY 2l[5
o,
{ {
,',e'1.-,ra,^i-ri'_
-;--r=

B. Narayana v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B. Narayana v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rice Millers Association, Vs The State Telangana

M/s. Garg Steels Udyog India Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director Vs State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Dr.K Satish Kumar Reddy Vs State of Ap,Prl.Scy,Medical,Hyd,and 3

Kavangal Triveni Akkireddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sheri Narsimha Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

G. Rakesh Vs the State of Telangana