Writ petition seeking mandamus against revenue authorities over land in Puppalaguda Village was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite the matter being listed under 'For Dismissal'. Pending miscellaneous applications were also closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
lr
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 3436 OF 2022
Between:
Mir Ahmed Ali Khan, Sio Late Mir Ajaz Hussain, Aged about70 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No 16-2-86713, 1st Floor, Akber Bagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad T.S.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, moreparticularly onein the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondentsas illegal, arbitrary, against the Principles of Natural Justice andalso in violation of Article 300-4of the Constitution of lndia, with regard to theproperty i.e., landin Sy. No. 277 to 234 and 245 of Puppalaguda Village, RajendernagarMandal,TelanganaState.
jEt:.
*il
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under section 151 cpc prayrng that in the c r :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cot.r may be pleased to declare the action of the Respondents in not considerrng arc rlisposing the Memo daled 01 .12.2018 along wrth apptrcation dated 03 11.2018 v,i h regard to fixing the date of hearing including the disposal of the application in li : f,lo. sEp-3/363/2003 dated 17 .07 .2002 with regard to the property i.e., rand in ,S y No 277 ro 234 and 245 of Puppalaguda Village, Rajendernagar Mandal, Telan,J r ra State.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S.J.A.NADEEM
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
{
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.3436 of 2022
ORDER:
This petition is coming lor hearing stnce 2022. On 08.10 2025 s,hen the matter was cal1ed, there u,as no represcntation on beherll ol the pctitioner, therelbre, the matter rvas directed to be iisted on 29.1.0.2025 under the caption " F-or Dismissal".
_)
i{j4
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if zlt ,, in this Writ
Petition shail also star-rd closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/ T.JAWAHAR REDDY ASS STANT REGISTRAR
.\ I <sup>.</sup> OFFICER $ecrror.r
To,
1 . One CC to SRl. S.J.A.NADEEM Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE , High Court for the St te of Telargana at Hyderabad [OUT] J Two CD Copies DAN PSK Yk
I \
HIGH COURT
DATED:1911112025
ORDER
WP.No.3436 ot 2022
..i;-
S
-, ttiU t,{I €
L
z
) 7 i q t.: t
C)
L
<br>t<. a
SparCHl
--_--
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS
.veA-[
(,v<br>G
<{aBn
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition be dismissed for non-prosecution given the petitioner's repeated absence?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mir Ahmed Ali Khan
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Land Administration Office, Rep by its Chief Commissioner
The Collector, Ranga Reddy District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Western Division
The Tahsildar, Rajendranagar Mandal
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
