The High Court of Telangana, on hearing a writ petition challenging tender notification conditions as illegal and arbitrary, dismissed the petition on the submission that the cause of action has ceased to survive.
No relief granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
I
[3302 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:23562 OF 2025
Between:
Rosmerta Technologies Ltd, Having its registered office at Plot No. 66, Vertika Tower Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr. Payyavula Sairam.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing Tender Notification No. e-NlT No. 05/SE/Tenders/2025-26 dated to 10.07.2025, without providing for a pre-bid meeting and prescribing arbitrary and restrictive eligibility criteria and contradictory and ambiguous conditions as reflected in paragraph 2 of this Writ Petition as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of lndia, and consequentlyquash the said Tender Notification or in the alternative direct the respondents to (i) provide for a pre bid meeting, (ii) Recognition of ATS-specific technical and operational experience (iii) Elimination of restrictive requirements mandating civil registration only in Telangana.
lA NO:'f OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affi,lavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all fulher proceedings pursuant to tender notification no. Ref No. e-NlT No. 05/SE/Terrdersl2025-26 dated 1010712025 issued by the respondents, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. ]NDUS LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ROADS & BUILOINGS
The Court made the follo^ring: ORDER
1
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH ITIRIT PETITION No.23562 of 2ol25
ORDER:
&ily, shall stand closecl
Sd/.S.MALLIKARJU
/ffRUE COPY//
OFFICER
To,
rwo cD coPies /W' BSR PMK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1811112025
ORDER
WP.No.23562 of 2025
-l t: c
k
(-)
1 I t{iifl 2ft?f,
* *
PATC
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
vL,
1,
1r1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rosmerta Technologies Ltd
State of Telangana
Superintending Engineer, DTC Transport Department
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
