Writ petition seeking consideration of a representation for exemption of vehicle tax under the Telangana Motor Vehicles Taxation Act. Without going into merits, the court disposed of it granting liberty to file a fresh representation, directing the respondent to consider it and pass orders within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
H,GH couRr t"?#8,:,'d,um l,t'#":flIioT H'DERABAD
[3302 ]
TUESDAY, o'luo?SXilEiT,,#fif I.",it?#.MBER
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
P
Between
fi'ffi :aBXsgl;ili!#,g];J:il;?,:fl
s:r,,,1,",15.fi3,8i;,ffi 5,,&T;#,:,.,
AND
...PETITIONER
1Iff
, Transport Hrsf,'Jfi 'aHXH65."#"i:rH3#,,8J..l:,:f; 3r,"",:i:f* 2. The Regional Transport Officer, RTA, Warangal , Hyderabad.
.RESPONDENTS
I
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of fvandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not considering the petitioner representation dt.02.05.2025 for exemption of tax of Rs.1,35,7g0l_ is illegal' arbitrary and in violation of principle of natural justice and consequen,y direct the respondent No'2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.02.05.2025 for exemption of tax of Rs. 1,3S,7g}l_.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner
dt.02.0b.2025for. exemption of tax of Rs.1,35,7g0/- by permitting the petitionerto disposalof abovewrit petition' ply thevehicle' '*o'nn Counselforthe Petitioner: SRI N'SREENIVASYADAV Counselfor the' Respondents: ASST'GP FOR TRANSPORT
TheCourt made the following:ORDER
il
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRTT ON No. L9377 of 2o25
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for thepetitioner and
learned Assistant GovernmentPleaderfor Transport for the respondents.
I I \ \ I :
2
1',,
SK, J W.P.No.19377 of 2025
petition€:r makes fresh representation, the respondents will
considel: the same in accordance with lar,v.
fo,
S ASSIS+;hY,+H,.ffiH IlTRIJE COPYll €
1 2
--._-__:_r.-:..
/
:.
J
d €
HIGHCOIJRT
DATED:18/1112025
\ \
I S
t-)
..-) [ 5 HhR t0?t
ORDER
WP.No.19377 of 2025
DISPOISINGOF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS
rd
Vt{r
:r. 4 *)'t'
I
I
1 issue framed by the court
Should respondent No.2 be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.05.2025 for exemption of tax of Rs.1,35,790/- from 2018 onwards?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner (name illegible in OCR)
Regional Transport Officer, RTA, Warangal
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
