Petitioners challenged official permission to install a cell tower allegedly on their land. The court noted a dispute over the survey number where the tower stands, permitted a fresh representation to the District Collector, who must decide it in accordance with law expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321e ]
HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 19071 OF 2025
Between:
....PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High Courtmay be pleased to issue writ, order, direction moreparticularly one in the natureof writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondentNo. 1 to 4 in giving permissionto respondent No.5 for installation of cell tower inpetitionersland admeasuring
AcO.2 Gts situated in Sy No. 134121 11, Sy. No. 134/2/ /2as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to immediately removethe cell tower.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2025
Petition Under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt maybe pleased1o direct.the respondent Nlo.'1 to 4 to act upon the representation Caled07.11.2024 and remove the cell tower that has been installed inpetitioners land admeasuring AcO.2 Gts situated in Sy.No.134/21 11, Sy.No.134l2l /2 in [Vlanwadavillage, Boinpally Mandal, Rajanna Siricilla District, Telangana.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI P.RAVI KIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S & 6 : -
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DE\II
WRIT PETITION No.19O7l of 2O2S
OR.DER
In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the action ofrespondent Nos. 1to 4 ingiving permissionto respondentNo.5 for insta,lla'tionof cell tower in the petitioners' land in Sy.Nos134/2/AAI 1 and134 l2/AAl2 AS illegal and arbitrary.
\
2
the representationought to have been made is the District Collector.
Miscellaneousapplications, pending ifany, shall stand
clo sed.
SD/- A. SRINIVASAREDDY REGISTRAR ISTANT //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
Secretariat, Stateof To ',l. The Principal Secretary, Panchayatrai Departmen Telangana at HYderabad.
SA GJP
K
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 510712025
a
('
,.- 2[6
4)
.i'
ORDER
WP.No.19071 of 2025
DISPOSING OF THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
u
e
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the permission granted for installation of a cell tower in the petitioners' land was illegal and arbitrary.
Where should the petitioners' representation regarding removal of the cell tower be addressed and considered?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Yellaiah
B. Sattaiah
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department
The District Collector, Rajanna Siricilla District
The District Panchayat Officer, Rajanna Siricilla District
The Panchayat Secretary, Manwada Village, Boinpally Mandal, Rajanna Siricilla District
T. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
