S. Narsi Reddy v. the Depot Manager, Apsrtc., and 2 Others

Telangana HC10 Sept 2025WP/13162/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ Petition 13162 of 2007, S. Narsi Reddy v. APSRTC (Depot Manager, Regional Manager, VC & MD), High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, decided 10-09-2025 by Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, J. Dismissed as infructuous on counsel's statement that the cause did not survive; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed. Subject matter: pay fixation from 2000 onwards, arrears and attendant benefits, mandamus under Article 226, alleged violation of Article 14; Section 151 CPC applications for expedition. No merits decided; no precedent value on pay fixation.

What did the court decide?

On the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous. ¶27-28

S. Narsi Reddy Vs the Depot Manager, Apsrtc., and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR R.AO

¶7

WRIT PETITION :13162 OF 2OO7

¶8

Between:

¶9

S. NARSI REDDY S/o Linga Redy, APSRTC., Hayathnagar Depot, Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

¶12

THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC., Falaknama depot, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Regional Manager, APSRTC., R.R. Division, Picket, Secunderabad.

¶14

The V.C. & Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶15

.RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Writ of a Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not fixing the^pay right from 2000 on wards and not^granting the. arrears as well as the attendant benefits accrued there under till now is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the^{rules and} violative of Art. '14 of the Constitution of lndia, consequently directing the respondents to refix the^pay of the^petitioner from 20-1-2OOO or the date of joining of the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits and arrears if any with immediate effect in the interest of^justice.

¶17

l.A. NO: 1OF 2007 P, NO: 1M64 OF 2007)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may^{be pleased} expedite the hearing of the WP in the interest of^justice.

¶19

O:1 F 11 MP. NO:1

¶20

Petition under Section 15'l CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to

¶21

expedite ther hearing of the Writ Petition by fixing an early date in the interest of justice.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. NARASIMHA GOUD

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N. SRUSHMAN REDDY (sc FoR TGSRTC ZONE 1)

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAIESHWARRAO}

¶26

SriV.NarasimhaGoud,learnedcounselforthepetitioner' informedthiscourtthatthecauseintheWritPetitiondoesnot survive for adjudication^{and the Writ Petitionhas become} infructuous.

¶27