Writ petition concerning regularization and promotion to a Junior Assistant post in a junior college. The petitioner failed to appear on three consecutive listings despite the matter being posted under the caption 'For Dismissal'. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 11251 OF 2015
Between:
P Premlatha, D/o Late Narayana Reddy, Junior Assistant, Kesav Memorial Junior College Narayanaguda Hyderabad Fl/o H.No.5-3-6/28, Street No.2 Annapurna Colony, Boduppal, R R District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....Respouoerurs
Petition Uncier Article 226 oI the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or writs more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in considering tne'clse of the 4th respondent foipromotion to the post of Junior Assistant in the existing vacancy of Junior Assistant in ri respondent college instead of considering the case of the petitioner in the said junior assistant as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and cannot bejustified in the eye of law consequently direct the respondents to consider the i - !.i I t1 case of the petitioner for regularization of her services in the existing vacancy of junior assistant in 3rd respondent college as per the orders of this Hon'ble Court
I
in W.P.No.5912 of 2000 dt 12-9-2012 with consequential berrt fits in the interest of justice.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2015(WPMP.NO:14874OF 20151
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circ lmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to fill up the existing vacancy ofju rior assistant in 3rd respondent cofiege by promotion without considering the cas( of the petitioner for regularization as Junior Assistant in said the existing vacancy' as per the orders of this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.5912 of 2000 dt 12-9-2012 pel ling disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CH.SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR HIGHER E )UCATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : --
The Court made the following ORDER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITION o.11251 0F 2015
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 14.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf ofthe petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 28.08.2025. On 28.08.2025 also, there was norepresentationon behalf of thepetitioner. Hence,the matter was directed to be listed on 11.09.2025 under the caption"For Dismissal".
As a sequel, miscellaneous applicationspending,if any, in this
Writ Petition, shall stand closed
SD/. M.JAWAHAR RED ISTANT RE
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To 1. Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, HighC for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 2. One CC to SRI CH.SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUCI
.1+-'...'jr,1.-7
I I
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110912025
ORDER
'( tj i1 t<br>., 10 1}, M
, -i.
"t.2,,.. -
''r;, l' -r r .i>-
WP.No.11251 ot 2015
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON - PROSECUTION t! It
. - 1. r:4"
.. ..,,"so,,*- €Fr.
WITHOUT COSTS.
@y.nt illlrl2l-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P Premlatha
The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl Secretary Higher Education
The Commissioner and Director of Intermediate Education, AP Hyderabad
The Secretary and Correspondent, Kesav Memorial Junior College Narayanaguda, Hyderabad
Mr Veeraswamy
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
