Dismissed¶44

P.Srinivas, Karimnagar Dist. v. Chairman and M.D. Scc Ltd. Kothagudem and 3 Others

Telangana HC9 Sept 2025WP/14791/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, W.P. No. 14791 of 2007 (decided 09-09-2025, N. Rajeshwarrao, J.): Singareni Collieries Security Guard's 2007 writ on Jamadar-promotion seniority, eligibility, hall ticket and Proceedings SCCL/EDP/RERT/NW 108 dismissed as infructuous without costs; Section 151 CPC stay and amendment applications closed; no merits adjudication; no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

In view of learned counsel's submission that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶27-28

P.Srinivas, Karimnagar Dist. Vs Chairman and M.D… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY^{OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO}

¶6

WRIT P ETITION NO:^{14791OF 2007}

¶7

Between:

¶8

P.Srinivas. S/o.Posham Security^Guard,SandPC Depot, RG-I, Godavari^Khani, Singarenr Collieries Company^{Limited,Rl/o.8.409'} Gandhi Nagar. Godavarikhani. Karimnagar District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The Chairman & I\rlanaging Director'^{Singareni Collieries companyLimited,} Kothagudem, Khammam^Dist.

¶12

2 The Chief General^{lrrlanager,Singareni, Collieries company Limited} Kothagudem, Khammam^Dist.

¶13

J The Personnel I/anager,^{(Recruitment Cell),-Corporate,, Singareni Collieries} company Limited, Ko[hagudem,^{KhammamDistrict.}

¶14

4 A.lr,4allaiah, S/o.A-saraiah Security^{Guard, Project Office,S andTC Area,} Bhoopalapalli Area, Warangal^District.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of^{lhe constitution of lndra praying that in the} circumstances stated in^{the affidavit filed therewith,the High court maybe} pleased to issue an appropriate wrrt,^{order or direction, more particularly one in} the nature of writ of^{lVlandamus, declaring the actionof the respondents 1 to 3 in} ignoring the^{petitioners seniorityas well as the eligibilityfor attendingthe written} test for the^post of^{Jamedars scheduled on 15.7 .2007 , through the office No.} Pioceedings SCCL/EDP/RERT/NW^{108, preparedby the 3rd respondentas} illegal, improper and^{void, while directingthe respondents 1 to 3 to considerthe} petitioners seniority and^place his candidature^{abovehis juniors and issue the hall} ticket enabling him to attend^{for the written test for the post of Jamedar and pass} such other order or orders^{as are deemedfit and proper in the interest of justice.}

¶17

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 18617 oF 2007)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the cirr rmstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in respect of w,i .en test for the post of Jamedars scheduled on 15.t.ZOOT as per the list p :pared by the 3rc1 respondent in his Proceedings SCCL/EDp/RERT/NW 108 r in the alternative direct the respondents 1 to 3 to permit the petitioner to at :nd the written test scheduled on 15.7.2007 for the post of Zamedar, pendinq I sposal of the above writ petition, and pass such other order or orders in the interr ,t of justice.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. N O: 23581 OF 2008)

¶20

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the r;i ( Jmstances stated in the affidavit filed in sLrpport of the petition, the High coL-r 1 may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the prayer seeking consequ: rtial declaration that the 4th respondent rs junior to petitionef in the cadre of S<:urity Guard for the purspose of promotion to the post of Jamadar and higher pos s.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms.K.SOUJANYA, rep., Ms.K.Ut AyA SRI Counsel for the Respondents No.'lto3 : SRt NANDIGAM Kf{ SHNA RAO -- Counsel for the Respondents No.4 :

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO}

¶24

WRIT PETITIO NNo -L479L^{OF 2007}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Ms. K.Soujanya, learned counsel^{representing Ms.K'Udaya} Sri, learned counsel^for the^{petitioner, informed this Court thatthe} cause in the Writ Petition does^{not survive for adjudication and the} Writ Pe[ition has become inFructuous.

¶27