APSRTC challenged a Labour Court award directing reinstatement with partial benefits against a workman. The parties settled before the Lok Adalat on 08.02.2020, and the writ petition was disposed of in terms of that settlement award, without costs.
Writ petition disposed in terms of Lok Adalat settlement award dated 08.02.2020; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 I
tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE ELE\IENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TW€NW FIVE
.:
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Between:
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Hayatnagar Depot, Ranga ReddyDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
. .. -:...., '' ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of tndia that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,. the Court may be .. :-i pleased to issue an appropriate writ, Order or direction especially one in the ,;|: , nature of Writ of Certiorari Calling for the records relating to thqimpugned Award dated 3.1.200T made in l.D.No.42tz}O4the Labour Court.l, Hyderabadpublished ,: : on 18-06-2OO7 in G.O.Rt.No.974, dated26.04.2007 allcwinjthe petitionin part ,i and directing thepetitioner herein to reinstate the I"tregpon@nt into service together with continuity of service and other qftgndatrcebeneJitsanC directingto with hold 2 increments without cumulative effect 2years andwlthout back wages andquash the same as being bad, illegal withbutjurisdictionand invalid.
)
Petitiorr under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay ol'execution of awarddated 3.1.2OO7made in I.D.NO.,42l2OO4the Labour Court.l, Hyderabadpublished on18-06-2007 in G.O.Rt.nO.974,dated 26.04.2007 e:xcept in regard toreinstatement, pendingdisposal of the writ petition.
Counselforthe Petitioner: SRIN. SRUSHMANREDDY, SC FOR TGSRTC ZONE.I
Counsel forthe Respondent No.l:SRI A. THIRUPATHI REDDY
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.2: GP FOR LABOUR
The Court made the following:ORDER
.i. ::
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO
Sri N. Srushman Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TGSRTC ZONE-I informed this Court that the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat'on 08.02 .2020 and, therefore, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition.
2: The High Court Legal Seruices Committee, has submitted .,.. report dated 06.02.2020 vide order ROC No.23?/HCLSC|2O2O, stating that theparties were identified by their respective counsel and also on ver,ihication .,',. of Aadhar Cards/Identity Calds ahdthe enquiries revealed that theparties have willfully and without
Miscellaneous applications, lf ooy,pending in this Writ
Petition, shall stand
\
/TRUECOPY,,
To, 1. 2. 3. m";$$$rwtl#"*r'$@jr;:. 4. 5.
\ <br>-,'i t;, .
HIGH COURT
DATEDil1l0gn025
( THE s
()
1 1 TF.8 Wfr
-8 \r-.
t
*
F a 1'(
WP.No .12576 of 2008
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION J,<S t+f,fza
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Hayatnagar Depot, Ranga Reddy District
S.Aruna Kumari
The Labour Court I, A.P., Hyderabad, Rep. by its Presiding Officer
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
