Writ petition under Article 226 challenged a government order concerning assigned land and sought possession of the schedule property. Without going into merits, the High Court disposed of it, permitting the petitioners to approach the competent Civil Court for declaration of title.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 8868 OF 2011
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 6 in issuing G.O.Ms.No.1380, Revenue dated 26.10.2007 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutiona I and consequently direct the possession of the writ schedule property to the writ petitioners.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WP P. NO: 11012 0 F 2011)
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to restrain the respondents from changing the nature of the writ schedule properties including making construction, etc and not to alienate or allot to 3rd parties pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.RAJA SRIPATHI RAO
Counsel forthe Respondents No.1&2 : Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI D.RANGANATHA KUMAR
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
, ,
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
UrRIT PETITION No.8868 of 2O11
ORDER:
This writ petition is flled under Article 226 ofConstitution of India seeking the followingrelief:
"...to issue a writ of mandamus orany otherappropriatewrit or order declaring the action of therespondentsNos.1,2and 6 in issuing G.O.Ms.No.1380, Revenue, dated26.10.2007as illegal, arbitraryand unconstitutional and consequentlydirect thepossessionof the writ schedule property to the writ petitioners...
the suit schedule property. No order as tocosts.
d
t
2
SD/.K.AMMAJI AS SIS'TANTREGISTRAR
\
//TRUECOPY//
ti T ONOFFICER
\y
I II
HIGH COURT
DATED:1111212024
co 0 5 FLil ZIE z
l( *
SPAT
ORDER
WP.No.8868 of 2011
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
@
W
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging G.O.Ms.No.1380, Revenue dated 26.10.2007 should be decided, given the petitioners' request to instead seek a declaration of title before the Civil Court
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Saraswathi
B. Omprakash Sharma
J. Prabhuram Choudary
Mangi Devi
B. Santosh Kumari
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Keesara Mandal
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
