Petitioner sought writ mandamus challenging land allotment proceedings under the A.P. Assigned Land Act. Court noted remand by Joint Collector for fresh enquiry and closed the writ petition without costs.
Writ petition closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original J urisdiction)
TUESDAY,THETENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITI ONNO:21453 OF 2011
Between:
B.RameshReddy,S/o.LimbaReddy,Busine^s^1h'No'5-6-530'JBResidency' Ftai M.t-t,PragithiNagar, Nizamabad-So3003
...PETITIONER
AND
(R5 is impleaded asper Court Order dated 02'08'2011in WPMPNo' 26608120111
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of the constitutionof lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue a writor orderor direction more particularlyone in the nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaring the action of the respondent No.,1 in issuing proceedings No.E3tB725t2O0Bdated28.05.2011 purportingto allot the petitioners landtorespondentNo.4asillegal,arbitrary'unconstitutionalii)declarethatthe respondentsactionininterferingwiththerightsofthepetitionerinrespectof property admeasuringAc.0.17 Gts inSy'No'160/4A2'Ac'O'23 Gtsin Sy.No.160iAA,Ac.0.08Gts in Sy No'160 Ac 0 37 Gts in Sv'No.158/43' Ac'0'37gts inSy.No.158/AA3,totaladmeasuringAc302gtssituatedatlmampurvillage' ToopranMandal,MedakDistrictuntilconclusionoftheproceedingsinitiated under theprovisionsof the A.P.assignedLand (Prohibitionof Transfers) Act' 1977
T
I.A. NO: 2OF 2011(WPMP. NO:26607 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed irr support of the petition, the High Coirrt may be pleased to allow the Petitioner herein to amen the writ affidavit and the prayer in W.P.No.21453 of 2011 by substituting the following prayer in place of original prayer ln the Circumstances, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus:- Declaring the action of the Sth respondent in issuing GO MS.No.172 dated 24.02.201'1 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and set aside the same; ii) declaring the aclion of the respondent No.1 in issuing proceedings No.E3/8725/2008 dated 25.O5.2O11 purporting to allot the petitioner's land to respondent No.4 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional; iii) declare that the respondents action in interfering with the rights of the petitioner in respect of property admeasuring Ac.0.17 Gts in Sy.No.160/A42, Ac.0.23 Gts. in Sy.No.160/4A, Ac.0.08gts, in Sy.No.160, Ac.O.37gts in Sy.No.158/43, Ac.0.37gts in Sy.No. 158/AA3, total admeasuring Ac.3.02gts situated al lmampur Village, Toopran Mandal, It4edak District until conclusion of the proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Assigned Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1 977
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(1//PMP. NO: 26109 OF 20111
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's rights including by dispossession or other wise in respect of property admeasuring Ac.0.1 7 Gts in Sy.No,160/442, Ac.O.23 Gts in Sy.No.160/4A, Ac.O.0BGts in Sy.No.160 Ac 0.37 Gts in Sy.No.158/A3, Ac.0.37gts in Sy.No.158/AA3, total admeasuring Ac3.02gts situated at lmampur village, Toopran Mandal, Medak Drstrict in any manner, pending the disposal of the w.p.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S. NIRANJAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3, 5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.21453 OF2O11
ORDDR:
Today, when the matter is taken upfor hearing learned counsel for thepetitionersubmits that after filing the writ petition, theJoint Collector, Medak has passed orders in File No.F3/851/2017,dated 3}.l2.2olg by remanding thematter back to respondent No.3-Tahsildar, Toopran toconductde-nouo enquiry by initiating proceedings afresh andafter giving due opportunity to theparties.In view of the same, no cause survives in this writpetition.
Miscellaneous petitionspending,if any, shali stand
closed. SD/- A.SRINTVASA REDDY ASSISTANTV ISTRAR /ffRUE COPY//
I
SECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 2 ?'l:33J?"'3iP"HHY,A|,E:B.?XAl"fiiJ?nt"o5,YiJ"''"ransanaat Hvderabad [OUT] 3 Two CDCopies BM GJP qv
HIGH COUR-T
DATED:10111212024
ORDER
WP.No.2145il of 2011
.-- r. 1:'iE S L
(
(-rt'
O.J fifi M a
*
P4tt)iiEo *
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS . f+ lh v,i-
B.RameshReddy
The District Collector, Medak District
The Revenue Divisional Collector, Sangareddi District
The Tahsildar, Toopran Mandal
Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
