Writ petition filed under Article 226 by multiple petitioners challenging a revenue order was dismissed by the High Court for Telangana for non-prosecution as no representation appeared from the petitioners despite listing for dismissal.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 26636 OF 2016
Between:
..,PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit nf"O in"r"iritn, the High Court may be pleased to ca'for the records and the;rd;;l;;i" No.F2t1931t2o16 from the offi99 of th.e 2nd Respondent. ot. oe-oi-ioi6' **d,irt issuance of notice to the parties as ilregar , arbitrarv and against th;6;;i; -D-irection of naturar justice and quash 1? nature of ""rg,P.r..,.suing Writ of Certiorarian afipropriaie wrtt, Oloei Jr preferabty one in the
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WP MP. NO:3?978OF 2016)
Petition under section -1.51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petitiSn, irrJiiJn court may be preased to stay the operation of the imouoned order viz., tiie oro"i'pr.r"o by the respt.No.3 in fire No.F/68e6/87 dateo z-e-isa, ;;;;-;#i'r;*ii/tne ,..spt.r.ro.2 herein viz., the Joint Co,ector Natgonda, in Case *o.rz:itsall2di6 dated 8th March, 2016, pending final disposal of the main writ petiti-n
Counsel for the petitioners: SRl. J SURESH BABU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,2&3: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 7: |(ANDAGATLA SRINIVASULU
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.26636 of 2Ot6
ORDER:
This petition is corrring for hearing since 2O16. On I3.LI.2O24, when the matter was called, there was no 'representation on behalf of the petitioners, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed tod.ay under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any in this tition shall stand closed.
SDI K. AMMAJI ASS REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// t- ON OFFICER
To,
KKS GJP w
(
HIGH COURT
DATED:1111212024
--.-r
\Hc S rat€
t(
o
2 i ,rAN 2[25 o
I'
ORDER
WP.No.26636 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
a'qkl)#"
Eesam Narsamma aggrieved
Eesam Kishan agriculturalist
Eesam Laxminarayana
Eesam Yadaiah
Eesam Kishan employee
Eesam Anasuya
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
