Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition challenging actions regarding a tower and power disconnection. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Permission for withdrawal; writ petition dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168l
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETI TION NO:6460 oF 2021
Between:
M/s. ln{us Towers Limited,^Surygy No. 133, 4_S1, Bth Floor, SLN Terminus. Beside Botanicat Gardens'e ainio6wii Hvalr"orj'_t'ijooji ilp.'bi t 'ii;i; Legal and Regulatory Heab'
AND
...pETrroNER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent straightaway searing the ground based tower erected at H.No. g-z293l82lN31olA. srtuated at Road No. 25, Jubiree HiHs, Hyderabad, and taking coercive action to demorish th same, without issuing any prror notice to the petitioner company, contrary to the status Quo order dated .29.04.2015 passed in w.P.No. 12940 ot 201s and the action of the 5th Respondent in disconnecting the power supply to sc No.A9050262 (uKSCNo. 100415301), without issuing any notice whatsoever, as arbitrary, ifiegar and in vioration of the wefi-setfled
t
principles of natura Ijustice and contraryof the provisionsof the Greater Hyderabad Municipal(1,)rporationAct' 1955
IA NO:'l OF2021
Petition under seclion151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledinsucportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedto direct the 3rdrespondr:ntto forthwith de-sealthe tower erected at H No. 8-2- 2g3l82lAt31}tA,situated at RoadNo. 25, JubileeHills,Hyderabad, pending disposal ofthe writ Petilion
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under sr:ction151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedn support of the petition,the Highcourt may be pleasedto direct the 5threspondent to forthwith restorethe power supply to SC No' 49050262(UKSCNO100415201),to the tower erected atH No' B-2' 2g3tB2tN31OtA,sitrratedat RoadNo. 25, JubileeHills, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ Petition
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRl. MOHD ISLAMUDDINANSARI
Counsel for the RespondentNos. 1to3:SRI K. SIDDARTHRAO, SC FOR GHMC
Counsel for theRespondent Nos.4&5: SRI R. VINOD REDDY' SC FOR TSSPDCL
Counsel for theRespondent No.6: SRI K.V.SUBBAREDDY
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRITPETITION No.6460 of 2021
ORDER:
Sri Mohd. Islamuddin Ansari, leamed counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court, to withdraw the present writ petition. In fact, leamed counsel has also addressed a letter, dated 22.10.2024 to the Registrar (Judicial) to list the matter for withdrawal, and accordingly this writ petition is being listed today under the caption 'for withdrawal'. Even Sri K.Siddarth Rao, leamed Standing Counsel tbr GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.l to 3 did not oppose the
same.
withdrawn. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as
to costs.
pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/.4.V.S. PRASAD ASSTSTANTEE9ETRAR //TRUE COPYII ,-Y SECTION OFFICER
To,
BM LSn
XD',, ')/
Lra
HIGHCOURT
DATED:2311012024
ORDER
WP.No.6460of 2021
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUTCOSTS
;"t + L1u4"t'
M/s. ln{us Towers Limited
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
