This order closes a writ petition challenging the GHMC's failure to prevent illegal construction. The court noted that the petitioner's grievance is now redressed following subsequent interlocutory proceedings and confusion regarding family affixes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 I
-n
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 1281 OF 2013
Between:
Smt. Vanga Hemalatha, Wo V. Surender Reddy Hindu, aged about 50years Occ House Wife H.No.B-1-'164, Karmanghat village Main Road, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a writ, order or more particularly in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus by declaring action of 1't and 2nd respondents in not preventing illegal and unauthorized construction by 3'd and 4th respondents without valid permission by occupying public road on southern side compound wall by blocking gate of the petitioner sons house bearing H.No.B-1-164/N, Kharmanghat Main Road, Ranga Reddy District, as wholly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of constitution of lndia and consequently direct 'lst and 2nd respondents to demolish the illegal and unauthorized construction being made by the 3'd and 4th respondents by occupying public road on southern side of the petitioner sons house bearing H.No.B-1-'164/N, Kharmanghat Village, Main Road, Ranga Reddy District, forthwith
l.A. NO: 1 0F 201s WP MP. NO: 25632OF 2015)
Petition under Section 'lS1 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the additional document of General Power Attorney, Dated:30.8.2012, pending disposal of the above writ petition
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013 WPMP. NO: 1556 OF 2013 )
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action against the illegal and unauthorised construction made by the 3rd and 4th respondents by occupying public road on southern side of the petitioner son's.house bearing H.No.8-1164/N, Kharmanghat Village, Main Road, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of Writ Petition
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014rWVMP. NO: 437 OF 2014
Between:
AND
.....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to VACATE the interim orders passed in W.p.M.p.No. 1 556 of 2013 in W.P.No.1281 oI 2O13, d1.23.01.2013 pending disposal of the Writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VENKATESHWARLU GUMMADAVELLY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&2: SRI M. DURGA PRASAD (sc FoR GHMC)
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.3&4: SRI G. RAVI MOHAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
€l
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.l281 of 2013
ORI}ER:
Heard Sri G. Venkateshwarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri M. Durga Prasad, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri G. Ravi Mohan learned Senior counsel appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4. Perused. the record.
KL,J w.P.No.12a1 of2013
2
W.P.No.40485 of 2014 and this Court directed theGreater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation not to demolish thesaid construction. The said writ petition is pending andthe interim order is subsisting.
KL,J W.P-No.l2al ot 20l3
3
Nos.3 and 4 proceeded with the construction in violation of the said orcler. Therefore, the petitioner filed a Contempt Case vide C.C.No.199 of 2Ol4 and this Court closed the said contempt case considering the interim order, dated 29.12.2014 passed in W.P.No.40485 of 2014 filed by respondent Nos.3 and 4.
SD/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASSIS'TANT REGISTRAR
/
,TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:2211012024
ORDER
WP.No.1281 of 20'13
HE ST4I (a
(
I )c
t
0 7 iii, 2U5
*
.:,-.1i'
:rr''
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS / /.A cQ /r/sl
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt. Vanga Hemalatha
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Vanga Harichandra Reddy
Vanga Venkat Reddy
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
