Emmadishetti Devender v. Sri Nageswar Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a contempt petition filed against the Respondent-Tahsildar. The court held that the prior order directed the District Collector, not the Tahsildar, negating any claim of violation by the Respondent. The contempt case was closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case is closed with liberty to file fresh case against District Collector; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 660 OF 2023
Between
Emmadishetti Devender, S/o. Late Siddayya, aged 3'l years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagaram Village Hasanparthy Mandal, Hanamkonda District
...Petitioner
AND
Sri Nageswar Rao, Working as Tahsildar, Hasanparthy Mandal, Hanamkonda District
...RespondenU Contemnors
Petrtion under Sections 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Acl 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent/ contemnor under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for willful disobedience of this Court's directions passed in WP No. 46401 of 2022, dt. 18.01 .2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can find a violation of its order directed against the District Collector by the Respondent-Tahsildar.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Emmadishetti Devender
- respondent
Sri Nageswar Rao
- respondent
District collector, Hanumakonda
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/660/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court