The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed in 2011 for non-prosecution/default on the day of hearing due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
)-1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 15044 OF 20'll
Between:
Smt. N. Rama, Wo. Shyamsundar Reddy Housewife Rl/o. H.No. 1-7-1641A, Golconda X Roads, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not conductang the survey and fixing the boundaries of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.10 guntas in Sy.No.'104 of Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as requested by the 2nd respondent in letter No. 67/Cr./2011 dated 21.03 2011 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently dlrect the 1st respondent to conduct the survey and fix boundaries of the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.4. 10 guntas in Sy.No.104 of Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District forthwith
/
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO:18072 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the'1't respondent to conduct the survey and fix boundaries of the land admeasuring an L,xtent of Ac.4.'10 guntas in Sy.No.104 of Puppalaguda Village, Rajendra Nagar [\4andal, Ranga Reddy District forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI O. MANOHER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
//
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.l 5044 of 2OlL
ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearing since 2011. On 20.11.2024, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption.[or Dismissa]". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalt of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any 1n this
petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. T. JA ASREE ASSISTANTRE ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 1112t2024
ORDER
WP.No.150tl4 of 2011
1 t\E 9TA r€
<br>aa:
,
o 03 u[H m6
!cs: PAit-, gt
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS (+ .)., ,s *.Cops
Smt. N. Rama
Tahsildar and Deputy Collector, Rajendra Nagar Mandal
Sub Inspector of Police, Narsangi Police Station
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
