The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 9233 of 2008 for non-prosecution/default. The petitioner failed to appear when the matter was called for hearing.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution/default without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 9233 OF 2008
Between:
Moorthy Ra nga Reddy, S/o. Ramchandra Reddy, aged about 65years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. lbrahimpatnam Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
..PETITIONER
AND
|1|The Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.|
|---|---|
|2.|TheSpecial Grade Deputy Collector, and RevenueDivisional Officer, Ranga
Reddy East Division,RangaReddy District.|
|3|TheTahsildar,lbrahimpatnam Mandal,RangaReddyDistrict.|
|4|Gorige Dharampal,(Died perLRsRR9to13),S/o. G. Ramaswamy,
AGR-iCULTURE, Pochampally VillageandMandal,Nalgonda District.|
|5|Smt. Gorige Chandrakala, W/o. G. Dharmapal,HOUSEWIFE,Pochampally
Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.|
|6|Gorioe Srinivas,(Diedasper LRsRR14tol7),S/o.SriNarasimha,
AGR-iCULTURE, Pochampally Villageand Mandal, Nalgonda District.|
|7|Smt. Gorige Manjula,Wo.Srinivas,HOUSEWIFE,PocharnpallyMllage and
Mandal, Nalgonda District.|
|8.|Gorige Jagadeeshwar, S/o-G.Dharampal,AGRICULTURE, Pochampally Village
and Mandal, Nalgonda District.|
|9.|Bumandia Jaya,WoB.Pandu,Aged.40Yrs,Ri/oH.NO,8-21,Mutakondara
VillageaMMandal,Yadadri District, Occ.household.|
|10|.G. Jyothi, W/o G. RajeshwarRao,Aged.36Yrs,RyoMPPatelguda Vi[agE,
lbrahimpatnam Mandal, R.RDistrict,Occ.housewife.|
|11|.Balam Lavanya,w/oLateB.Srisailam,Aged34ylsrRyoH.No.2-'17,
RevenapallyVllage,Pochampally Mandal,Yadadri Districl,Ooc.Household.|
|12.|Marri Sharada,WoShiva Shankar, Aged.30Yrs,R/oDundoo Mailaram (V),
lbrahimpatnam Mandal, R.R District,Occ.household.|
|13.|G. Nagamani,W/oK.Mahesh,Aged. 27 Yrs,R/oH.No. 1-18, Mukunoor Village,
lbrahimpatnamMaMal, Occ.Household.|
|14|.O.Maieshwari,WoO. Madhu,Aged.25yrs,Ri/oBoduppal, Ghatkesar Mandal,
Medchal-Malkaigiri Oistrict, Occ.Housewife.|
|'15|.G.Rakesh, S/o LateG.Srinivas, Aged-24 Yrs,Fl/oH.l"lo.6-9'1, Ramnagar
Colony, PochampallyVillage and Mandal, Yadadri District, Occ. student.|
|16.|G.Shivashankar, S/o LateG.Srinivas, Aged. 22 Yrs,NoH.No.6-91,Ramnagar
Colony,PocfiampallyMllage and Mandal, Yadadri District,Ooc.student.|
|17.|G. Mallamma, W/oLateG.Narsimha,Aged.8'lYrs,FVoH.No. 6-91, Ramnagar
Colony,PochampallyVillage and Mandal, Yadadri District, Occ. student.|
Respondent Nos. 9 to 1 7 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased Respon^d-ent Nos. 4th and 6th resp-ectivety as pei aJpJ, C.O.ai. Zi.Ot-.iOZq ,n ta No.1l2O24
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Nlicre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court mly-be pteased to issue writ order or Direction more particurarry one in- the nature of wRrr oF IYA\D3MtlSrdectaringthe impugned orderspaisedby the 1st respondent in Case No. OSl1128lO7 dt. 1-12-ZOOT 99{rJning the orders pasied by the ZnO responaent in File No. 4212635/05 dt. 31-j0-2006 aa iltegat, arbitrary, improper, contrary to lhe orders passed by the Land Reforms Tribunlr, Hyderabid East Division in'c.c.No. 199211175 dt. 15-12-19T5, and consquently set iside the same, and to grant such other relief or reliefs
l.A. NO: I OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 12210 OF 2008)
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the fl91l!!!din support of thepetitio_n,ttre irigi Courtmay be pteased ro granr stayoi ?ltlll"lproceedings pursuant to the orders passedin Case No. A2t26iStOS dt.'3110-2006 by the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt RAKESH SANGHT
Counsel for the Respondent No.l to 3: Gp FOR REVENUE
Gounsel for the Respondent No.5, 7 & 8: SRI SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI
Counsel for the Respondent No.9 to 17: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
/,
i-<br>
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.9233 of 2008
ORDER:
This writ petition is coming for hearing since 2008. On IL11,.2O24 when the matter was called, there was no representation on behatrf of the petitioner, and therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 02.12.2024 under t]le caption "for dismissal". Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/defautt. There shali be no order as to costs. 3. Pending misceilaneous applications, if any in this petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- P. PADMANABHA DY ASSISTANT REG //TRUE COPY// I SECTION FFICER To, 1 One CC to SRI RAKESH SANGHI, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Tr,t/o CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. IOUTI One CC to SRI SRINIVAS VELAGAPUDI, Advocate {OPUC! 4 Two CD Copies BN BN q,y
H!GH COURT
DATED:09/1212024
ORDER
WP.No.9233 of 2008
E_ 5 Ta rt: (i
)j
li c
17 BEt 2t24
t)
)
o
i
oEsPAl
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
(,a ,8
+ l,.)l
<br>
Moorthy Ranga Reddy
The Joint Collector
The Special Grade Deputy Collector
The Tahsildar
Gorige Dharampal and Others
K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
