Dismissed
M.Bhikshapathi Goud, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Telangana HCWP/8799/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 8799 OF 2009
Between:
M.Bhikshapathi Goud, S/o. Ramalingam,aged 55years,OccBusiness'Rl/o. 41-125117, East Pragati nagar, Moulali, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or directionparticularly a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in seekingto dispossess the petitioner from the premises bearing No. 10.2115 in Plot No.47 in S.No.495 constructed in the land admeasuring 655 squareyards at Jyothi Colony, Balaji Nagar,jawahar Nagar Gram Panchayat, ShamirpetMandal, R.R'District' Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, and oppose to theprinciplesof natural justice and Article 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and issue aconsequentialdirection directing the respondents their agents, their employees claimingthrough them not to dispossess the petitioner from the premises bearing No-10-21/5in plot No.47 in S.No.495 constructed in the land admeasuirng 655 squareyards at Jyothi Colony, Balaji Nagar, Jawahar Nagar Gram Panchayat, ShamirpetMandal,R.R.District, Hyderabad
l.A. NO: 1 OF 20O9(WPMP. NO:11542 oF 2009)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumslancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with thepossession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respective of the premises bearing No.10-21/5 in Plot No.47 in S.No.495 constructed in the land admeasuring 655 squareyards at Jyothi colony,
Balaji Nagar, J€wahar Nagar Gram Panchayat, Shamirpet lt4andal, R.R.District, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the W.P.No._8799/2009
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N S BHASKARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.8799 of2OO9
ORDER:
This writ petition is coming for hearingsince 2OO9'On 24J0.2024 when the matter was called,there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, andtherefore,the matter was directed to be listed on 14.11.2024under the caption "for dismissal". On 18.11.2024, whenthe matter was called, learned counsel for the petitionersought time and thereforc, the matter was directed to belisted on 02 '12 '2024 under the same caption. Today, when thematter is ca-lled' there is no representation on behalf of thepetitioner'It seems that the petitioner is not interested toprosecute this case'
petition, shall stand closed.
SD/-V. ITHA ASSISTANTRE ISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTTONOFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0911212024
,ri S fA1
{'
r)
(
2 7 tt8 t[25
-l
9€,. pr, rcvro
ORDER
WP.No,8799 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETIT]ON FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT CCISTS
G$
@ slzlz{
M. Bhikshapathi Goud
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Justice K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court