The single-judge bench of K. Sarath, J. disposed of W.P. No. 18083 of 2010, filed against the State and Revenue authorities regarding demolition of structures. Without going into merits, liberty was granted to approach the appropriate forum.
Liberty granted to petitioners to approach the appropriate authority in appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:'18083 OF 2010
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under,Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on part of the Respondents in
rt
la
demolishing the compound wall and a room of petitioners situatecl in an extent of Ac.9-32 guntas, covered by Sy.No.324, situated at poppalguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Nticle 14,21 and 300-4 of rhe constitution of India, and consequenfly direct the Respondents to reconstruct the compound wall and not to interfere any further with the possession of the petitioners over the above said lands without due process of law.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201 O(WPM P. NO: 22846 oF 2010)
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to restrain the Respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the land admeasuring.Ac. 9-32 guntas covered by Sy.No. 324 of Poppalguda Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI HARENDER PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
SK, J W.P.No.18083 of 2010
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.18O83 of 2OlO
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents ln demolishing the compound wall and a room of petitioners situated in an extent of Ac.9-32 gts covered by Sy.No.324 situated at Poppalguda Viilage, Rajendranaga:: Mandal, Ralga Reddy District, as illega1 and arbitrary.
Revenue appearing for the respondents, based on the counter averments, submits that in connected matters, this Court dismissed W.P.Nos.208 and 3627 of 2OlO on lO.O7.2Ol2 and 19.08.2017 respectively, for the (I same relief asked by the petitioners therein and
,:-J t/
2
SK, J W.P.No. 18083 of 2010
:
requested to pass similar order inthe present writ petition.
costs.
t\
SD/. S.MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSIF TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER
BSR
PSK
G
It
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1011212024
I,
ORDER
WP.No.18083 of 2010
BF- s'r )-t-
(:-
,i o
(
i :
i"l B 7 tri ilti;
!. ti .: ,-i,
l
'i'-. t,
'.- , (,il
PNTL
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION,
WITHOUT COSTS
dlr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should dispose of the writ petition without adjudicating upon the merits.
Whether liberty should be granted to the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority.
T. Sana Yadi Reddy and Others
State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
