Allowed

Mohamed Zafarullah@ Zafar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Jul 2024CRLP/5978/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought by A-1 accused under Sections 307 and 109 r/w.34 IPC for allegedly beating the complainant with baseball bat and rods. Court noted case and counter cases between the parties and granted anticipatory bail with surrender within two weeks and a personal bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender before SHO, P.S.Nampally within two weeks, on personal bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties, and Section 438(2) conditions.

Mohamed Zafarullah@ Zafar Vs The State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.5978 of 2024

¶2

ORDER :

¶3

Petitioner/A-1 has filed this petition seeking anticipatory bail in Cr.No.147 of 2024 of P.S.Nampally, registered for the offences under Sections 307 and 109 r/w.34 of IPC.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

¶5

The allegation against the petitioner is that he, along with others, tried to kill the complainant by beating him with baseball bat, hockey sticks, rods and nickel punch and caused head injuries.

¶6

The case of the petitioner is that he never attacked the complainant and that he has been falsely implicated in this case in view of previous disputes between himself and the complainant. It is contended that in the event of arrest, the petitioner will be subjected to great hardship. It is contended that the petitioner is a law-abiding citizen and is ready to co-operate with the Police in investigating the case and that he will comply with the conditions that may be imposed by this Court in the event of his release.

¶7

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the

¶8

application stating that the involvement of petitioner herein in the

¶9

¶10

JS, J Crl.P.No.5978 of 2024

¶11

incident is captured in CCTV, and hence, petitioner is not entitled for anticipatory bail.

¶12

Having heard both sides and perused the material on record, since there are case and counter cases between the petitioner herein and the complainant, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions:

¶13

The petitioner/A-1 shall surrender before the Station House Officer of P.S.Nampally within two weeks from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioner on bail on his executing a personal bond for Rs.20,000/- with two sureties, each for the like sum.

¶14

The petitioner shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.

¶15

Petition is accordingly allowed.

¶16

____________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J

¶17

Date: 08.07.2024 rev

Mohamed Zafarullah@ Zafar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohamed Zafarullah@ Zafar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Vijaya Lakshmi and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Chedurubelli Ramanji Vs The State of Telangana

Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni Vs State of Telangana

Sodgam Venkateshwar Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Gopadi Madhava Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Dr. Konda Srinivasulu Vs State of Telangana