Dismissed

Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Jul 2024CRLP/6971/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of FIR No. 333 of 2020 against Accused No.3. The Additional Public Prosecutor reported that a charge sheet was filed before the trial court during pendency. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous, granting liberty to challenge the charge sheet in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

None; liberty granted to question the charge sheet in accordance with law.

Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni Vs State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

I J

¶2

132571

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶4

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:6971 OF 2020

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni, Wo. V.S.^{Prasad Devabhaktuni,Aged about 49 years,} Occupation. Business, Resident of^H.No.5-1 16/1,^{Abhiram Cricket AcademyRoad,} Donthanpally, Near ICFAI Business, School,^{Hyderabad, Telangana - 501503.}

¶10

...Petitioner/Accused No.3

¶11

AND

¶12

State of Telangana, Through^PS Shahabad,^{Represented by its Public} Prosecutor, High Court for the State of^Telangana.

¶13

Smt. Netyam Jayalakshmi, W/o^{RaieshBabu, Aged about45. years,.Occ'} Housewif6, R/o Plot No.593/4, Road^{No.31, JubileeHills, Hyderabad-} 500 033.

¶14

...Respondents/Complainants

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay} be pleased to^quash the criminal^{proceedings initiated againstthe Petitioner/} Accused No.3 (i.e., Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni)^{in FIR No. 333 of 2020dated} 181'11l2O2O on the file of PS Shahabad, Cyberabad.

¶16

l.A. NO: I OF 2020 lN CR L.P.NO.6971 0F 2020

¶17

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the^{Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay} be pleased to stay^{all furtherproceedingsincluding arrest of the Petitioner/} Accused No. 3^{(i.e., Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni)in FIRNo 333 of 2020 dated} 181'l1l2O2O on the file of PS Shahabad, Cyberabad,^{pending disposal of the} present Criminal Petition.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^Petition and^{upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.VIKRAM,} Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional^{Public Prosecutoron behalfof the} Respondent No.'1 and Mr. V.MURALI MANOHAR, Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

I gjH3rva5 a +
J -c
.:
) t1,0t n0 By cl
C/
lo )/ c
"r" fH! rl

¶21

¶22

¶23

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADT SRIDEVI

¶24

CRIMINAL PETITI ON No.697l OF 2020

¶25

ORDER

¶26

When this matter is taken up [or hearing, learned Additional Public

¶27

Prosecutor subm itted on instructions rhat during the pendency of this criminal petition, charge sheet has been filed before the trial Court, and hence, this Criminal Petition, has become infructuous.

¶28

In view of the above submisr;ion, this Criminal Petition is

¶29

dismissed as infructuous. However, liberry is granted to thc petitioner to

¶30

question the charge sheet in accordance r,rith law

¶31

Pending miscellaneous applications, ilany, shall stand closed.

SD/.MOHO.ISMAIL

ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

/TTRUE COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

To,

2.1. The Two Station CCs to^{House the PUBLIC fficer, pnOilLuion' ShababadPolce High Station' Court Cyberabadat Hvderabad(oUT)} J, o;; cCt"^{snt p. vtxnnu,Advocate[oPUCl} 4 o^" c-Ct"^{sCr V.uunaltutnruonnn' Advocate[oPUCl} 5 Two CD Copies

¶38

RC/p p qY

HIGH COURT

DATED: 04107t2024

ORDER

CRLP.No.69T1 of 2020

THIS CRIMTNAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS 1,^s ).\ Y,L^^1s 1

Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Sunitha Devabhaktuni v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Obul Setty Hari Babu Vs State of Telangana

Rachakonda Srinivasa Rao Vs Nukala Saidi Reddy

Smt. P. Madhavilatha and 12 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

K. Vijaya Lakshmi and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Chedurubelli Ramanji Vs The State of Telangana

Mohamed Zafarullah@ Zafar Vs The State of Telangana