The High Court dismissed the criminal petition as infructuous after the Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the case was closed during pendency due to lack of evidence.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions, if any, to stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s7 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TTIE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
CRIMINA L PETTTIO N NO: 6876 0F 2020
Between:
Chedurubelli Ramanji,. S/o Ch.Lingaiah, Aqed about 2g years, Occ: B[iil+""rffA#,orl]i]:rrr..i,ni"ijE,ri,"virra'se,a;,m..;raHiJnoli"i,rirgo'no,
AND
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
RESpONDENT No.1/COMpLAtNANT
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section !82 o! Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or crimilai'petrtion, the High court mav be pPg:"^l-9quash the proceedinss registereJ'in' irn r.io. soi""iioio"ji,"o 06'11.2o2o oh the fire of the po'iice siation trrrr<r<adapaily, Hyderabad for the alleged offences punishabte under section - sr.iriir l, 417, 4g3, 342, 313 tpc., & section 3(r), 3(s) SCs/ STs (pOA) Act
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri VENUGopAL REDDY KAMATHAM, Advocate for the petitioner and the pubric prosecutor for the state of relangana on beharf of the Respondent No.i and of sri v SREENTVASA RAO, Advocate forthe Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
II
THE TION'BLI, SMT.JUSTTCEJUVVADI SRIDEVI
CRIN{INALP ETITION No.6876 OF 2020
ORDER:
WhenthematteriStakenup,IeamedAdditionalPublicProsecutor on instructions submittedthat during the pendency of this criminal petition, the caservas closedas lack of evidence, and hence,this criminal petition has becomeinliuctuous.
Recording the aforesaidsubmission,the Criminal Pe'titionis
disn-rissed as infructuous.
Miscellar.reous Petitions,pendir.rgif any,shall stand closed'
Sd/- A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// t SECTION OFFICER
To
PR w
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410712024
ORDER
)' a _,. ; ..i "r1 i{".
t
oo 71t71
7 ? cil'l
<br>
CRLP.No.6876 of2020
DISMISSINGTHE CRL.PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
qaoR{"b tr-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 182 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chedurubelli Ramanji
The State of Telangana
Smt Kalimera pooia
JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
