The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging the removal and sale of the petitioner's sand without notice as infructuous upon counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33001
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVETVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 29760 OF 2015
Between:
lshak Khan, S/o lsham Khan, Aged: 49 years, Occ: Business, Fl/o Satapur Village, Renjal fvlandal, N izama bad District.
..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF IVANDAT\4US, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4in taking away the petitioners sand approximately 100 Tippers inquantity, which was placed at Survey No.135, in an extent of Ac.0.05 Gts. of land situated at Neela Village, Renjal ltrlandal, Nizamabad District and selling away in the Public market without issuing any notice is arbrtrary, bad and illegal and violation of Article-14 of the Constitution of lndia and contrary to the A.P. fVlines and Minerals, Concessions Rules, consequently direct the Respondents 1 & 2 to take action against the Respondents 3 & 4 andpay the compensation to thepetitioner for 100 Tippers quantity of sand. in the interest ofjustice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP, NO:38555 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay of taking the sand from thepetitroner possession which is kept at survey
No.135, in an extent of Ac.0.05 Gts. of land situated at Neela Village, Renjal f/landal, Nizamabad Distlct, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KURITI BHASKARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 4: - - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.29760 OF 2015
OI(DEII
I-earnccl counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in thc'
Writ I']etition rloes 1-rot survive for further adjudication.
as infructuous. No orcler as to costs.
Pent'ling nrisccllaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closecl
SD/.K, SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
3 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
6
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311112023
ORDER
WP.No.29760 of 2015
1 gE SrAfg
( ,\tPpZ
d o1D[c 2r2]
t,. {'
{:i 4 /ri-'r!(- r'.,-i'...7'l- ..
- _.:.i-r-":.-..; * a.:,,'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
&
Ishak Khan
The State of Telangana, Rep by Asst. Director of Mines and Geology
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
