A writ petition in the Telangana High Court was dismissed as infructuous by the court after counsel for the petitioner informed that the subject matter had become so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3300 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 15312 OF 2014
Between:
M. Niranjan, S/o Sadanandam, OccAgriculture, Rl/o Rangapuram Village, Nallbelly Mandal, Warangal District.
...'ET'T'ONER
...RES'.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol theConstitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or order direction moreparticularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring theproceedings of the 1st Respondent in [Vlemo No. 7768lM.lV(1)t2011 dt. 27-12-2013reviving the lease in favour of the 4th Respondent for Laterite and Dolomiteover an extent of Ac.26.28mgts., of land in Sy. No. 72t2 situated at MallampallyVillage, Mulugu Mandal, Warangal Districtis illegal, arbitrary, contrary to theMineralconcessions Rule 1960 and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently set asidethe same.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WPM P. NO:'18971oF 20141
Petition under Section 151CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the HighCourt may be pleasedto suspend the operation of theproceedingsof the 1st Respondentin Memo No.7768/M.lV(l)t2011, dt.27-12-2013pending disposal of the abovewrit petition Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI J' VENKATESWARAREDDY Counsel for the RespondentNo.1to 3: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY Counsel for the RespondentNo.4: SRI E. VENKATAREDDY The Court made the following:ORDER
l
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.15312OF 2074
ORDER:
Today when the matter is taken up for consideratiory Sri J. Venkateswara Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner
informed this Court that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructuous
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the
Writ Petition shall stand closed.
sD/-P. ch. TNAGABHESISIHiA //TRUECOPY// '#r,o* oFFlcER
To
i*:33Jii$+JF\ffiIEfia%$1%%\fil?%5'tfi#3ls*"',"ot . l*:t8tjRYI ut**rAREDDY' AdvocatetoPucl
I \
HIGH COURT
DATED:0211112023
ORDER
9r ATE OF
.rN\ o
E -. N\ ?5
, '} <br>CL l
r pr-9P 1L
WP.No.15312 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 cc((6
)) \u
M. Niranjan
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Director of Mines and Geology
Assistant Director of Mines and Geology
M/s Basera Laterite Mines & Minerals
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
