The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a quarry lease as infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner admitted the cause did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 21274 OF 2013
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly Respondent No.2 in Proc.No.E/397912012, dt.15-06-2013 cancelling th€ NOC issued by the Tahsildar 6th respondent dt.09-01-1999 for grant of quarry lease for Lime Stone Slabs over an extent of ACs.2.00 in Sy.No.12913 of Ogipur Village, Tandur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, illegal, u nconstitutional, inviolation of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to A.P. Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 R/W Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1966 and Assignment Rules and consequently direct the
respondents 3,4 and 5 not cancel the quarry lease granted on 19-03-1ggg and renewed on 06-01-2009
l.A. NO:1OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 26055 OF 2013)
Petrtion under Section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Orders of 2nd respondent in Proceedings in I No.E21397912O12, dt 1 5-06-201 3 pending disposal of the writ petition.
l.A. NO:2OF 2013(WPMP. NO : 26056 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No.3, 4 & 5 not to cancel the quarry lease granted on 19-03-1999 and renewed in favour of lhe petitioner in proceedrngs dt.06-01-200g pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT P.VIJAYA LAKSHM|, REp. FOR SMT N.SHOBA Counsel for the Respondent No.1, 2 & 6: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to 5: GP FOR MINES AND GEOLOGY
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.21274 of 2013
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Smt. P.Vijaya Lakshmi, leamed counsel representing Smt. N.Shoba, learned
counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writpetition does not survive for adjudication.
as infrucfuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending inthe
Writ Petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPYII
sD.-K. VENTAlAH ASSTSTANT Redfrnen ,/ sEcfloN 8it,"en
To,
BSR
BS
$.
1
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0311112023
ORDER
WP.No.21274 of 2013
l rrE ST4 rq
e
q 6
a 0 2 IEC 20n oz
*{+
!",
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
DEENDER GOUD
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
JOINT COLLECTOR
DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
