Dismissed

M/s Mohan Steels (India) Pvt. Ltd., v. The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited

Telangana HC2 Nov 2023WP/4052/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of Writ Petition No. 4052 of 2014, filed by M/s Mohan Steels against parties of APCPDCL, not because of merits but as infructuous since the subject matter was no longer contentious, dismissing it without costs and closing the pending miscellaneous petition.

What did the court decide?

Payment of costs not made; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petition closed.

M/s Mohan Steels (India) Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Central… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 4052 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s Mohan Steels (lndia) Pvt. Ltd.,^(Service Connection^{No. MDK-1276)} Survey No. 17O,¹⁷¹ , 172 and 177,l,lltzapallY^{Village, ShankarampetMandal,} Medak Dist rep.by its [\rlanaging Director, Man^{lt/lohanAgarwal.}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P.^{Limited,(APCPDCL),rep. by} its Chairman and Managing Director, Mint Compound,^Hyderabad.

¶12

The Chief General l\rlanager^{(Commercial),} The Central^{Power Distribution} Company of A.P Limited,^{(APCPDCL),[V1intCompound,Hyderabad}

¶13

a The Superintending Engineer, Operation,^{the CentralPower Distribution} Company of A.P. Limited, lvledak^at Sangareddy,

¶14

The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation, Central Power Distribution^Company of A.P. Limited, Ivledak at Sangareddy

¶15

..,RES'ONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of^{lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more^particularly oneⁱⁿ the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action^{of the respondents in not. deratingthe} petitioner's Contracted Maximum Demand from 995 KVA to 70 KVA with^effect lrom 12.11.20't 3 in terms Clause 5.9.3. of General^{Termsand Conditions of} Supply of the l st Respondent as highly^{illegal, arbitrary,and unjustand violative} of Articles t a, 19(1 )(g), 265 and 300-A of the^{Constitution of lndia and} consequently set aside the^{LetterNo. CGM(ComlySC(CyDE(C)/ADE-|ll/D.No} 3609/'13 dated 16.12.2013 of the^{2ndrespondent}

¶17

l.A. NO: 2OF 2014(WP MP. NO: 5003 OF²⁰¹⁴⁾

¶18

Petition under Section^'151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Courtmay be pleased to}

¶19

¶20

I I I I I

¶21

direct the respondents to forthwith derate the petitioner's Coltracted [,4aximum Demand from 995 KVA to 70 KVA in terms of its notice dated 12.08.2013 as per Cause 5.9.3. of General Terms and Conditions of Supply of the 1st Respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶22

l.A. NO: 1OF 2O14(WVMP. NO : 1081 OF 2014)

¶23

Between:

¶24

The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, |APCPDCL), rep. by ils Chairman and Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyclerabad.

¶25

The Chief General lvlanager (Commercial), The Central Porver Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, (APCPDCL), Mint Compound, Hyderabad

¶26

The Superintending Engineer, Operation, the Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, Medak at Sangareddy,

¶27

The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation, Central Power D stnbution Company of A P. Limited' I,edak at Sangareddy

¶28

...pETrroNERS/RESpoNDENTS

¶29

AND

¶30

M/s Mohan Steels (lndia) Pvt. Ltd., (Service Connection No. IVDK-1276) Survey No. 170, 171 , 172 and 177 , lrllirzapally Village, Shankarampet l,4andal, Medak Dist rep.by its [r,4anaging Director, l,4a n Mohan Aganval

¶31

...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶32

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WP IVl P No. 5003/2014 in WP No. 405212014 dated 14.02.2014

¶33

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D. V. NAGARJUNA BABU ADVOCATE FOR M/s. MADHURI PUJAKAR

¶34

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. VINOD REDDY(SC FOR TSTRANSCO)

¶35

The Cou( made the following: ORDER

¶36

¶37

THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶38

WRIT PETITION No.4052 OF201.4

¶39

ORDER:

¶40

Today when the n-ratter is taken up for consideration, Ms.Madhuri Pujakar, learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that the subject matter of this <sup>/rit petition has become infrucfuous

¶41

Recording the above submission, writ petition is dismissed as infrucfuous as no further orders are required to be passed. No order as to costs.

¶42

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions , if any, pending in the

¶43

Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶44

¶45

SD/-MOHD.^ISMAIL ASSISTAIJIREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEcffN oFFlcER

¶46

To, 1 2. 3 ffi 33^tS #i^{Ht?,[8S J="',$'ftt ?8fi Tl?tfrnl$ o r ro p u cl} 3 Two CD CoPies BM

. GJP

Su>-

HIGH COURT

DATED:0211112023

ORDER

WP.No.4052 of 2014

1 rr.E STA)-r:
(
qA
p
z
L
? | Ilil\l ? l
.,4
t Dr o -,r 'lt .
\S:-..
lii:;i -'

¶55

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION^{AS INFRUCTOUS} WITHOUT COSTS

¶56

*
\5 p._a(

M/s Mohan Steels (India) Pvt. Ltd., v. The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Mohan Steels (India) Pvt. Ltd., v. The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanisetti Anjaneyulu Vs State of Telangana

Duddu Venkaiah and Another Vs K.Vinod Kumar and 2 Others

Smt. Gadda Badhramma Vs Bommidi Balaiah

M/s. Sri Sai Granites, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

M. Niranjan, S/o Sadanandam, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Revelli Somaiah Vs Annapuri Narsimha and 2 Ors.