The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission that the cause did not survive for further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3300 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 29732 OF 2015
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in taking away the petitioners and approximately 20 tippers each in quantity, which was placed near Chinavagu, Hotel Gangava situated at Neela Village, Renjal Mandal, Nizamabad District and selling away in the Public market without issuing any notice is arbitrary, bad and rllegal and violation of Article-14 of the Constitution of lndia and contrary to the A.P. Mines an(l fVinerals, Concessions Rules, consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the Respondents 3 and 4 andpay the compensation to thepetitioners for 20 Tippers each quantity of sand, in the interest of lustice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 38526 0F 201s)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to stay of taking the sand from the petitioners' possession which is kept near Chrnavagu, Hotel Gangava situated at Neela Village, Renjal Mandal, Nizamabad District, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KURITI BHASKARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MINES & GEOLOGY
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I I i I i
I I I I
jI
THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.29732 OF 20L5
ORDER:
Learrrec{ counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in
the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
as infructuous. No orc{cr as to costs.
l'cntling rniscc[laneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed
To,
SD/.K. SREERAMAMURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,i (.8 / SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
BN BS W
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0311112023
ORDER
WP.No.29732 of 2015
1t\t S TArG
a
q
N i l
oo 1 tJ I2
^+
t i_
t)F s P
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
3'{(o5 \qt{;"{,il,
Asifuddin
Rafi
State of Telangana
District Collector, Nizamabad
Mandal Revenue Officer, Renjal Mandal
Village Revenue Officer, Renjal Mandal
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
