The High Court granted the petitioner's request for leave to withdraw the Writ Petition challenging the registration of sale deeds on Government Temple land and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the Writ Petition; the Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[320e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OFJULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19746 OF 2018
Between:
S. Digamber, S/o.Late Shankar Rao,Age 49 years, Rl/o-H.No.19-5-21N2,Kamaldal Mill, Opp. Devaibagh Temple,Puranapul, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
(R32 is impleaded as per C.O. dl. 0210112023 in l.A. No.3l2022l
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction moreparticularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring theaction of the respondent No.6 in registering the sale deeds in respect of GovernmentTemple Land ( Mahadev Temple) in favour of respondentsNo.7to 23 in respect of the premises bearing Municipal No.15-1-652 to 656 admeasuring1861Sq.meters, situated at Old Feelkhana, Hyderabad, executed infavour ofrespondents No.24to 31in violation of the Letter bearingNo.Lr.N o.81351112015dated10.4.2015issuedby the sth respondent to the 6th respondent,wherein a list of prohibited properties are mentioned and the action of lherespondentsNo.4 in sanctioning permission for the construction of Groundplus 6 floorsin respectof prohibited properties without verifying the records as arbitraryillegal, without jurisdiction,settled principles of law and vioaltive of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the respondenl No.6not toentertain any furtherregistration with regardto the premises bearing MunicipalNo.15-1-652 to656 admeasuring1861 Sq.meters, situated at Old Feelkhana,Hyderabadcontrary to the proceedings of the Sth respondent vide LetterNo.B/3511/2015 deted 10-4-2015.
lA NO: 1 OF 2A22
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to permit the petitioner lo carry out amendment to the consequentialprayeras prayed for in the interest ofjustice.
I I
lA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition undcr Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the documonts filed by the petitioner by condoning the delay if any in the interesl of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PRANAV FOR SRI AADESH VARMA
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI N.ASHOK KUMAR, (SC FOR GHMC)
Counsel for the Respondents No.5 & 6 : GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONBLE DT. JASTICE CHILLAKUR SUMAI'ATHA
WRIT PETITION No.19746 OF 2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is liled secking thc follor,ving substantive relief:
I
"to issue an appropriate Wnt, Ordcr or dircction, more particularly, one in thc naturc of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action ol respor.tdcr-tt No.6 in registering thc sale deeds prcsented b1' thc pctitioncr in r<:spect of Government Temile Land (Mahadev'l'emplc) in favour of respondent Nos.7 to 23 in respect ol thc prcrniscs bearing Municipal No. 15- 1-652 to 656, admcasuring 1 86 1 square me[ers, situated at OId tfcelktrana, l{yderabad, executed in favour of respondent Nos.24 to 3 I . in violation of the Letter No.B/35 l1l2015, datcd 10.04.2015, issued by respondent No.5 to respondent No.6, wherein a list of prbhinited propcrtics au-c men I ioncd ancl the action of \ responderrt No.4 irr sArrctroningp( rmission lor thc construction of Ground+ 6 I?loors in .respect of prohibited properties without verifying the records, as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction :rnd contrary to the settled principles of law and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently, to dilect respondent No.6 not to entertain any further registration with regard to the subject premises, contrary to theproccedings of respondent No.5 vidc I.etter No-B/3511/2015, dated 10.04.201 5."
ii;
2
4 . The Writ Petition is dismissed as rvithdrau,n. No order as to costs
SD/.A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
//TRUE COPY//
V, sEcroN dFrtcen
5- Two CD Copiets. BSK LSA-_-
CC'I oD,\
HIGH COURT
DATED:0510V12023
ORDER
WP.No.19746 of 2018
t' :) ii\ -:}_<br>a. t..
C),.)
-c 13 luL ?$n
. -;!
.,'f,.
DlSMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
0n
1
t9
S. Digamber
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Endowments
The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Tahsildar
CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
