Dismissed

Badruddin Dhanani v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Nov 2023CRLP/9213/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash proceedings, the petitioner and his counsel did not appear on the hearing day. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, reserving the right to move the court again if cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition dismissed for non-prosecution; petitioner at liberty to move the court if cause survives.

Badruddin Dhanani Vs the State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

r t, l; f

132s1 |

I ? I

I I I

( rlt H. t,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶7

THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶10

c RIMINAL PETITION No : 9213 OF²⁰²¹

¶11

Between: i

¶12

Badruddin Dhanani, S/o. Gulam Hussain Dhanani, Aged about 67^years, Occ - Business, Rl/o. Near Laxma Reddy Garden, Back side of HP Petrol^Pump, Champapet, Hyderabad.

¶13

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

¶14

AND

¶15

THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through its Public Prosecutor,^{High Court at} Hyderabad.

¶16

...RESPONDENT No.1/COMPLAINANT

¶17

Petition undbr Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying thatⁱⁿ the^{circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Petition, the High Court may} be pleased to^quash the^proceedings against the^{Petitioner/AccusedNo. 1 in} S.C. No. 601 of 2017 on the file of the^learned Vll^{Additional Metropolitan} Sessions Judge at Hyderabad, arising^{from CrimeNo.282of 2015 of PS} Kanchanbagh in the interest of^justice.

¶18

s , .i, .1.: ', i,* ' l.'

l.A NO: 1OF 2021

[!.

[!. t Iⁱ ii^{Petition under Section482 of CI.P.C praying that in thecircumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the^{High Court may} be pleased pleased to stay all further^{proceedings against the Petitioner/} Accused No.1 in SC No.-601 of 2f17 on the^file of^{thd Learned Vll Additional} ,.^{Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad, arising from Crime No.282 of 2O15} . bf PS Kdnchanbagh in the interest of^justice.,

¶25

¶26

; This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the^{argumentsof Sri H} SUDHAKARA'RAO ,Advocate for the Petitioner^{and the Public Prosecu{or on} udfrairbr thri Respondeni No:t. l

¶27

Th.e Court made the followlng: ORDER

¶28

{
(
JlIt
I

¶29

ri+!i-. -,'-.. --^.- {

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER AL PETITION r{o.92 13 otr 2o21

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

l. This Criminal petition is filed to quash the proceedings agarnst ttre petitioner/Al in SC No.60l of 2OlZ on the file of VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad.

¶33

None appeared, on 29.Og.2O23. Even today also there is no appe€rrance on behalf of the petitioner

¶34

Criminal petition is dismissed for non_prosecution. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move this Court, if cause survives. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

¶35

stand dismissed'

¶36

s o/' N''ilt["imi:rGc 'cxetoRasexHARRAo r-si'cAR

¶37

r i i tnRUE coPY// ['[ I To'. il" : I

¶38

sEcrYN^oFFlcER

¶39

l rli TheVll Additional^{Metropolitan.Sgs.sr.on} tt-uooe a-t Hyderabad' :'i: d:,A ;sCi^{n siionnxnnnRAo' AdvocateIoPUCI} i^g. Two Ccs^{to pUeLtS"P?iii;llionHighCourt for the Stateof Telansana} i r^{at nYterabad'touTl} I lt3.K' 4:^{Two CD CoPies}

¶40

i I

¶41

tI I t;I ) I I

¶42

il ia ifII : IIi !T I

HIGH,COURT

DATED:09t11t2023

l- r l1 {I I I i,i r i ,i: :[,, !,I r .ra -} ORDER',t^t') i I:, l'i t CRLP.No.9213 of 2A21

¶47

IiTiLt IrP,

¶48

CRIMINAL, PETITION lS'DISMISSED - FOR NON PROSECUTTON I i r' ;jL.. ,ⁱ

¶49

-d$iK."

¶50

L ,- t'I - t. I.. i-i--

¶51

; :
-1.
,b
.t.i t{ ri,l:d ,

¶52

Badruddin Dhanani v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badruddin Dhanani v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Rama Krishna Vs State of Telangana

Mohammed Mazhar Ullah Vs The State of Telangana

Thopoji Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Kongara Divya Vs State of Telangana

Moyya Raghavendernath Vs The State of Telangana

Chamakuri Dhanalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana