Dismissed

Mohammed Mazhar Ullah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Nov 2023CRLP/5279/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court quashed proceedings against the petitioner in an FIR regarding criminal trespass, forgery and cheating. The investigation was remanded to conclude without arresting the petitioner during its pendency, and pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings quashed; investigation to conclude without arrest of petitioner; miscellaneous applications closed.

Mohammed Mazhar Ullah Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

t³²⁵¹ l

¶2

I L

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE.

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5279 oF 2018

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mohammed Mazhar Ulrah, s/o Late Mohammed Anwar U[ah, Aged about 46 years, occ: Business-, Ryo. H.No.1/p, pater rncrave, atiiprr virr"gi,"Gii,p.it'il,ll"ilr, Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

AND

¶11

...PET|TIONER/ACCUSED No.2

¶12

1 ' The state of reranoana, Rep. by pubric prosecutor, High court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶13

SMS Mo-hiuddin, No.- 1126, Madison St. Dearborn, Ml, USA. Reo bv his power of Attorney, Mutlaza Mohammed H,toa2am Afi,"Ag;-::9ir-d 6";"_ Pyqilg"l .No.^{21o,cresent Heishrs,NRi-VitL,} xiJiniifrirr,-na;6r;;:y District, Telangana.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶15

Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in FrR. No.203i20.1g, on the file of the Narsingi, P.S. Ranga Reddy District, in the interest of Justice and equity.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 oF 2018

¶17

Petition under section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of crirninal petition, the High court may be pleased may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings in FlR. No. 20312018' on the fire of the Narsingi, p.S., Ranga Reddy Dislrict, incruding Arrest of the PetitionerlA2, and pending disposal of the Criminal petition.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri ch. JANARDHAN REDDY, Advocate for the petitioner and the pubric Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of sri p. HARI pRAsAD REDDY, Advocate for the Respondent No.2

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

1 F f ,tt n ca

tei

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER} AL ON No.52^{79 0F20La}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This^{Criminal Petition ishled to quashthe Proceedings} against^{the petitionerin FIR No'203 of 2018 on the irle of PS'} Narsingi,^{Ranga ReddyDistrict for the offencesunder Sectiots 447 '} ,

¶26

467, 46a,^{469, 506 r/w 120b IPC'}

¶27

¶28

The case^{is of the Year 2O18The stage of investigationis not}

¶29

known.

¶30

3 Inviewofsame,thepolice,Narsingi,Cyberabad,isdirectedto However,^{the petitioner/A2 shalt not be}

¶31

conclude^{investigation'}

¶32

arrested^{during pendencyof investigation}

¶33

disposed^off.

¶34

1. Accordingly,^{theCriminal Petition ls} Consequently,^{miscellaleous applications pending' ifany 'shall}

¶35

stand closed.

¶36

,TTRUE^COPY//

¶37

SD/.P33BYi$fB#TEFffiT \ Sr+/ SECTION^OFFICER

¶38

To, 1. The^{XXlll Metropolitan Magistrate' Cyberabadat Raiendranagar'}

¶39

The^{station Houseofficer, Narsingi poricestation, cyberabad District.}

¶40

One^{CCto SRICh' JANARDHAN REDDY' AdvocateIOPUC]}

¶41

4 Two ccs to^{pubric prosecutor,High court for the state of relangana at} HYderabad [OUTI

¶42

One^{CCto Sri P' HARI PRASAD REDDY' AdvocateIOPUCI}

¶43

Two^{CD CoPies}

MP GJ

HIGH COURT

DATED:0811112023

.1 ti T4 re:
t
J e
21 rEC 2023 o
* *
PATC
ORDER

¶48

CRL.P.No.5279 ot 2O18

¶49

DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶50

w >9

Mohammed Mazhar Ullah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Mazhar Ullah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.v.Sreenivasa Rao (A-1) and another Vs State of Telangana and 2 others

Mohammed Saleem Jalna Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd. J. Saleem @ Mohammed Saleem Jalna Vs The State of Telangana

M.Rama Krishna Vs State of Telangana

Thopoji Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

The State of Telangana Vs Kota Ananda Rao