The Criminal Petition seeking quashing of FIR No.217/2018 registered under Sections 420,468,471, 477 IPC was disposed of as the petitioner did not appear and no interim orders were granted previously.
Criminal petition disposed off; liberty granted to petitioner to approach the Court if cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEK.SURENDER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5246OF 2018
Between:
M.Rama Krishna, Residing at 1-1-336i39/A/1,Vivek Nagar, Chikkadpally' Hyderabad 500020.
...Petitioner/Accused
AND
Hyderabad-
...RespondenUDefacto Complainant
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the flighCourtmay be pleased toquash the FIRNo.21712O18dated 16.03.2018'registered by the Gochibowli Police Statron, Cyberabad,Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay suspend all furtherproceedings in FIR No.21712018 dated 16.03.2018 registered by the Gachibowli Police Station,Cyberabad,Hyderabad including the appearance of thepetitioner.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition andupon hearing the arguments of Sri T.M. Shanti Kumar, Advocate for thePetitioner(Not Presenting) and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the RespondentNo. and of Sri SVS Prasada Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
i
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMIITAL PETITION No.S246 0F 20ta
ORDER:
1 This Criminal Petition is frled to quash the proceedings in FIR No.2l7 /2018 dated 16.03.2018 on the frle of PS. Gachibowli, Cyberabad, Hyderabad registered for the offences under Sections 420,468,471, t77 IPC.
stand dismis
/ffRUE COPY//
Sd/- P. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT EIGISTRAR v
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
J2( PSR$
HIGH COURT
KS,J
DATED:0811112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.5246 o12018
*
or 1 E( 4 4'
,a
Cr<br>C)
sr-"Y
tr! vt
F q-.s IJJ
o C,
s
'J'
<br>I H \l *
DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINALPETITION
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash proceedings in FIR when no interim order was passed at the time of filing.
Whether the High Court should keep the petition pending or dispose of it despite petitioner's absence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Rama Krishna
The State of Telangana
B.Krishnaiah
JUSTICE K.SURENDER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
