The Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC filed in the High Court of Telangana to quash proceedings as infructuous was dismissed, as the trial court had already closed the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER 8 F I L E
Between:
AccusedNos. 1to 3
AND
"ResPondents/ComPlainant
Cr.P.C PraYingthat inthe Petitionunder Section 482 of of Groundsof Criminal Petition' circumstancesstatedin the Memorandum sh the Proceedingsagainst the the HighCourtmaY be Pleased to qua the Courtof the SPecialSC & ST petitionerhereinin SC No' 110 of 2016 in for thealleged offenceunder Court,L'B.Nagar, Ranga ReddyDistrict )SC and STPOAAct,2015)' section504, 506 r/w 34 and Sec 3(1)@(s
i Ii i
I I
IA o. ot 2o1a Petitionunder Section 482 ofCr'P'Cprayingthat inthe circumstancesstatedln the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition' the HighCourt may be pleasedto grant stay of all further proceedings againstthe petitionersin connectionwith the case in SC No' 110 of 2016 in thefile of the Special SC & ST Court' L'B'Nagar' Ranga ReddyDistrict for theallegedoffence under Section 504' 506 rlw 34 and Sec 3(1)@(s) SC andST PoA Act,2015) in the interestofjustice'
A o 20 I
Petitionunder Section320 (2) of Cr'P'C praying that inthe circumstancesstated in the Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition' the HighCourt may be pleasedto record the compromiseentered by both thepetitioners/AccusedNo'1 to 3 and this respondentsby consideringthe affidavitof petitioner/2nd respondent/complainantto arrowthe criminal Petitionin the interestof justice'
ThisPetitioncomingonforhearing,uponperusingtheMemorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petitionand upon hearingthe argumentsof Mrs N.MalathiNaidu, Advocate for the Petitioners Public Prosecutoron beha lf of the RespondentNo. 1, Mrs' T' Saritha'Advocate noneappearedfor the RespondentNo.2.
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
:
I
TIIE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMTNAL PETITION No .7038 0F 2()18
ORDER:
stand dismissed.
sd/- P. GowRr sHA R ASSISTANT REGI RAR
I lTRUEcoPY/ /
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1.The Special SC & STCourt, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District 2.The Station HouseOfficer,Peddemul Police Station,RangaReddy District
*{0,
HIGHCOURT
DATED:08.11 '2023
ORDER
GRLPNO- 7038 of 2018
1 e SrAr€ o
v
2 5 lrN 2t2[ (,)
oo
.k
t ncar:riC "r.a.)
DISMISSINGTHE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS.
t1,,<br>N<-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thopoji Laxmi
Thopoji SarveshwarReddy
Thopoji VikramReddy
State of Telangana
Sri Justice K Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
